On February 12, the U.S. Department of Justice announced a $4 million fine against peer-to-peer encryption platform Paxful. The company previously admitted that, lacking anti-money laundering and customer due diligence mechanisms, it had long transferred funds for criminals and profited directly from these activities. The related funds are alleged to be connected to human trafficking, scams, extortion, and illegal prostitution activities.
Prosecutors disclosed that between January 2017 and September 2019, Paxful facilitated over 26 million transactions totaling nearly $3 billion, earning approximately $29.7 million in revenue. The Department of Justice pointed out that the company had promoted its platform as “no identity verification required” and published anti-money laundering policies that were not actually implemented, thereby attracting high-risk customers.
Investigations revealed that Paxful had partnerships with the seized illegal classified ad website Backpage and similar platforms. The U.S. Department of Justice stated that its founder privately boasted that the “Backpage effect” drove platform growth. Between 2015 and 2022 alone, such collaborations generated about $2.7 million in profit for the platform.
Initially, prosecutors believed a fine of $112.5 million was appropriate, but considering the company’s cessation of operations and inability to pay, the final penalty was set at $4 million. Paxful shut down at the end of 2025. The company attributed its collapse in a statement to misconduct by former management and high compliance remediation costs.
Former co-founder Ray Youssef responded that the platform had fallen into an irreversible crisis before his departure. Another co-founder and former CTO, Artur Schaback, admitted in 2024 to conspiracy for failing to maintain an anti-money laundering system and is currently awaiting sentencing.
This case is seen as another landmark event in the U.S. strengthening enforcement of crypto compliance, sending a clear signal to the industry: platforms that ignore anti-money laundering obligations will face dual pressure from criminal and regulatory authorities.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Brazilian Central Bank requires crypto exchanges to provide daily proof of sufficient assets and segregate customer funds
The Central Bank of Brazil has issued new regulations requiring licensed cryptocurrency trading platforms to submit proof of funds daily starting from 2027 and to adhere to banking standards for data protection. Accounts must be segregated, and cross-border transfers will be restricted to prevent money laundering and other criminal activities.
GateNewsJust Now
CFTC Chairman: The coming weeks will clear obstacles for U.S. perpetual contracts
CFTC Chairman Mike Selig stated that the agency will allow professional perpetual contracts to operate in the U.S. within the next month and expects to issue an announcement. Meanwhile, the CFTC and SEC are advancing digital asset policies through Project Crypto, aiming to provide clear guidance for the industry. SEC Chairman emphasized that legal certainty is still needed, and relevant legislation in the Senate is still under negotiation.
GateNews29m ago
What should private investors watch out for when investing in SpaceX, OpenAI? Breaking down the risks of pre-IPO private placements
Tokenization Pre-IPO is popular in the crypto space, but investors should be cautious of potential risks, as what is purchased may only be a promise rather than actual shares. SPV is a common compliance tool and must adhere to regulatory requirements, especially regarding legal and investor qualification issues. Phyrex pointed out that some products are merely derivative exposures, and investors need to be careful to avoid the risk of illegal fundraising.
ChainNewsAbmedia1h ago
Hong Kong Airdrops Stablecoins, U.S. Clarifies Boundaries: The Institutionalization Stage of Stablecoins
Over the past two years, regulatory discussions around stablecoins have become increasingly intense. Hong Kong and the United States have respectively introduced regulatory frameworks, marking the transition of stablecoins from market experiments to formal institutionalization, making them compliant assets. Hong Kong plans to issue stablecoin licenses and promote their use, while the US clarifies their positioning within the financial system, demonstrating that stablecoins are gradually integrating into the mainstream financial ecosystem. This shift lays the foundation for the sustainable development of the global digital currency ecosystem.
PANews1h ago
Federal Ruling Raises Risk for Polymarket, Kalshi in Nevada
A federal judge has returned Nevada's civil enforcement action against prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket to state court, increasing the risk of restrictions on their operations amid growing state regulatory pressure.
TheNewsCrypto3h ago
Kalshi "Haminin Abdication" $50 million contract sparks controversy! CEO issues a call: Reject death arbitrage
Kalshi recently caused controversy due to the death news of Hameini, leading to a surge of funds into related prediction contracts, which resulted in settlement chaos and a trading halt. Although Kalshi refunded users with a net loss of approximately $2.2 million, the platform's promotional activities were criticized and prompted U.S. lawmakers to call for investigations into similar assassination-related contracts. Polymarket also faced controversy, as the settlement of certain contracts angered users and raised suspicions of insider trading.
区块客4h ago
