Bitcoin ETFs Attract $88M as Ethereum Flows Stall to Near Zero

BTC-0,96%
ETH-2,29%

Bitcoin retains stable institutional demand as Ethereum ETF flows remain thin and volatile.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded solid inflows on Feb. 20, while Ethereum products drew little new capital. Data shows most demand remains concentrated in a few major issuers. At the same time, monthly trends indicate momentum has slowed since mid-2025. Flow patterns continue to favor Bitcoin over Ethereum in both scale and stability.

IBIT Leads $88M Bitcoin ETF Inflow While Growth Momentum Slows

Bitcoin spot ETFs pulled in $88.04 million in net inflows on Friday, with capital once again clustered around two issuers. BlackRock’s IBIT absorbed $64.46 million, accounting for roughly 73% of daily flows. Fidelity Investments’s FBTC added $23.59 million. All other Bitcoin funds finished flat.

_Image Source: _SoSoValue

IBIT’s cumulative net inflows now stand at $61.30 billion, reinforcing its dominance within the Bitcoin ETF market. No competing product approaches that scale.

Mid-last year, BTC investment vehicles delivered several strong months with $5 billion to $8 billion in inflows. However, the trend flipped to a sharp multi-billion dollar outflow in November. And this trend continued in the two months that followed. In the current month, these funds continue to run well below earlier expansion phases.

Although cumulative assets remain near record levels, on-chain data shows that growth has cooled. Even so, recent inflows suggest stabilization rather than a fresh wave of acceleration.

Ethereum ETFs Stall as Daily Inflows Barely Reach $17K

While its Bitcoin counterparts posted positive flows, Ethereum spot ETFs painted a weaker picture. Total net inflows on Feb. 20 came in at just $17,210, a fraction of Bitcoin’s $88 million haul.

BlackRock’s ETHA added $1.78 million, while Fidelity Investments’s FETH saw a $2.45 million outflow. 21Shares’s TETH gained $687,000, and other funds were flat. ETHA’s cumulative net inflows now stand at $11.88 billion.

_Image Source: _SoSoValue

In contrast, Grayscale Investments’s ETHE still carries a historical net outflow of $5.19 billion, showing continued capital rotation away from older structures.

Daily data also points to higher volatility in Ethereum flows. Jan. 30 recorded $252.9 million in outflows. Feb. 11 and Feb. 12 saw $129.2 million and $113.1 million in redemptions, followed by another $130.2 million exit on Feb. 19. A few rebound sessions near $50 million offered relief, but swings remain sharp.

Cumulative Ethereum ETF inflows sit near $11.52 billion, with total net assets around $11.14 billion. By comparison, IBIT alone exceeds $60 billion in cumulative inflows.

Bitcoin Consolidates Institutional Lead as ETH Flows Lack Depth

Bitcoin continues to hold a larger and more stable institutional base, while Ethereum flows remain more reactive to short-term price moves and macro headlines. Recent data shows momentum has cooled for both assets, but volatility in Ethereum ETFs remains noticeably higher.

ETF flows act as a real-time signal of institutional risk appetite. Friday’s inflows confirm capital is still entering Bitcoin products in meaningful size. Ethereum figures, by contrast, point to thinner demand and less consistent allocation. Without steady multi-week accumulation in ETH funds, the gap in institutional adoption between Bitcoin and Ethereum could widen further.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

NYDIG Warning: AI May Trigger Monetary Easing Cycle, Potential Macro Bullish Signal for Bitcoin

NYDIG Research Director Greg Cipolaro of a crypto financial institution pointed out that artificial intelligence could drive economic growth and liquidity expansion, thereby benefiting Bitcoin. The impact of AI may lead to changes in employment structures, prompting governments worldwide to adopt loose policies and enhance the attractiveness of risk assets like Bitcoin. Historical experience shows that although technological innovation presents short-term challenges, society ultimately integrates the technology, and businesses and workers who adapt to AI are expected to achieve higher returns.

GateNews7m ago

Approximately 9.09 million BTC are currently in a loss.

Odaily Planet Daily reports that, according to CryptoQuant analysis, approximately 9.09 million BTC (accounting for 46% of the circulating supply) are currently in a loss.

GateNews14m ago

Bitcoin Vs Gold Is OVER – Bitcoin Is Secretly 66% Undervalued

Samson Mow, the CEO of Jan3, has dared to make a statement regarding the current position of Bitcoin. He says that Bitcoin is selling at a great discount against its past association with gold and the liquidity of the world markets. In his opinion, Bitcoin is positioned 24-66 percent below the

Coinfomania18m ago

Over $9 billion in funds flowed out of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs within four months

U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have experienced record outflows over the past four months, with institutional interest in digital assets significantly declining. The Bitcoin ETF has seen a net outflow of $6.39 billion, and the Ethereum ETF has seen outflows of $2.76 billion, leading to sharp declines in the prices of both tokens.

GateNews47m ago

Every war institution uses the same trick! Investment bankers analyze the "Three Stages of Capital Flow": Don't buy in during panic.

After the US-Iran conflict, retail investors suffered losses due to panic selling, while institutions adopted a steady approach. The article analyzes the historical market volatility patterns during wars, highlighting the long-term potential of high-quality companies and sectors such as energy and military industries. It advises investors not to panic and sell in the early stages, but to wait patiently for opportunities to readjust their portfolios.

動區BlockTempo47m ago
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)