GateUser-f3b35a7b

I found something very interesting — if you invested 10,000 USD when Trump took office, you would now have: BTC → 6,050 USD ETH → 4,510 USD XRP → 4,180 USD LINK → 3,725 USD SOL → 2,930 USD DOGE → 2,300 USD ADA → 2,340 USD AVAX → 2,120 USD SEI → 2,005 USD DOT → 1,770 USD ENA → 1,080 USD

$Jellybean makes me think of early Ethereum Hippos. I missed out on SOL, but I feel like Hippos are very likely to appear on ETH. Already on board, looking forward to $Jellybean being the next $MOODENG

I've always thought that Brother Sun looks a lot like someone... But once you accept this idea, it's hard to move on. However, this shows that choosing a partner based on appearance might not mean they'll love you, but they'll definitely have money. #孙宇晨 #Bai Yingcang #缅北 #web3

If you had spent 1,000 yuan in 2010 to buy $BTC and held it until now, it would have become 10 billion RMB. It sounds quite easy—just hold on, right? But when you actually lay out the profit curve, you'll realize that the emotional journey involved is not something most people can withstand. 1,000➡, 10,000➡, 100,000➡, 30,000➡, 5 million➡, 800,000➡, 20 million➡, 3 million➡, 500 million➡, 80 million➡, 10 billion

Newly disclosed documents in the #EpsteinCase have reignited massive controversy over allegations against Prince Andrew:
He has been accused of witnessing a young girl, only 6-8 years old, bound to a table and subjected to alleged "electric shock torture" by Ghislaine Maxwell.

web1 = 🧑‍💻 + 📧 web2 = 🧑‍💻 +📱 web3 = 🧑‍💻 + 🏦 web4 = 🧑‍💻 + 🤖 + 🏦

Indeed, it's very rare to see an event that hasn't even started yet where you can't find a spot, especially with Ai Agents present on site raising their hands🙋

Every bull market produces big new whales... and they are getting bigger and bigger. 8 hours ago, Ethereum treasury company FGNexusio reduced their holdings by 7,550 ETH ($1406 thousand ). FG Nexus ($FGNX) has already lost $8698 ten thousand dollars on ETH investments: They bought 50,600 ETH during the DAT company's hot period in August-September last year, with an average price of about $3,940, worth $2 billion at that time. After the ETH price dropped, they from

What must men learn after getting rich?

What is a hot trend? Liu Qiangdong works himself to exhaustion, has been fighting with JD.com for over 20 years, with hundreds of thousands of employees, an annual net profit of over 40 billion yuan, and a market value of approximately 0.9 Zhipu.

Welcome everyone to register

Let's review the reasons why Xiumin has been subjected to online abuse over the past few years. It's not because of his eloquence, high emotional intelligence, or likability, but because his "authenticity" has touched a nerve for some people. In an era that appears glamorous on the surface but is filled with internal uncertainties, his straightforwardness and authenticity are often hard for others to accept. His high emotional intelligence allows him to navigate complex social situations with ease, but this has also become a focal point for criticism by certain individuals.

Web1.0: Humans only read
Read Web2.0: Humans can write
Write Web3.0: Humans can own
Own Web4.0: AI reads, writes, owns, makes money, trades independently; humans can be absent, or even completely disengaged (whoever can come up with a way for AI to make money on its own will live very comfortably)

In 2026, one of the three important things is: making good use of AI. Don't waste time debating which AI is the strongest anymore. Truly capable people have four AIs working for them simultaneously. My approach is simple: first ask ChatGPT to get the underlying logic. Then pass it to Gemini to fill in gaps and add examples. Next, give it to Claude to restructure into a system. Finally, have Grok critique it, find loopholes, and remove redundancies. One question, four perspectives. Cross-validate and iterate repeatedly.

Regarding the structural indicators brought about by the rise and fall of metrics, there is still much for us to learn. Why not watch this episode of the video and see what we can learn? When institutions bottom fish, retail investors take it as a "safety signal"—this is the real market paradox. For those seemingly "safe" bottom-fishing actions, they may just be the tip of the iceberg in capital game-playing. The essence of the market has never been "safety," but rather "risk redistribution."