
U.S. Representatives Steven Horsford and Max Miller have recently reintroduced the “Protecting, Accounting, Regulation, Innovation, Taxation, and Revenue Act” (PARITY Act), aiming to comprehensively update the framework of existing U.S. cryptocurrency tax policies. The latest version removes the $200 small-transaction de minimis threshold, formally introduces wash sale rules for digital asset transactions, and clearly distinguishes “passive staking” from active trading and participation.
Current U.S. cryptocurrency tax policy requires holders to report the capital gains or losses from all digital asset transactions, even routine small payments, which the industry widely criticizes as an overly burdensome administrative requirement and as a disincentive to promoting cryptocurrencies as a payment tool.
The PARITY Act is being advanced by lawmakers from both parties. Its bipartisan nature is seen as a strategic attempt to build broad support for the crypto industry during tax policy debates. Over the next few months, the U.S. Congress will broadly discuss tax matters, and industry insiders expect that any tax legislation that could potentially become law will strongly push to include provisions related to cryptocurrencies.
Removal of the $200 De Minimis Threshold: The original draft set a $200 de minimis threshold for transactions involving “regulated payment stablecoins,” but the latest version deletes it. The replacement is: as long as the taxpayer’s cost basis in regulated payment stablecoins is not less than 99% of the redemption value, no gain or loss will be recognized upon sale; for exchange-traded transactions, there is a presumed cost basis of $1
Introducing Wash Sale Rules for Digital Assets: The latest draft explicitly provides that cryptocurrency transactions will be subject to wash sale rules (Wash Sale Rule), preventing investors from manufacturing tax losses by quickly selling and then buying back the same asset. This is not a highly controversial position—similar provisions were already included in Senator Cynthia Lummis’s tax bill last year
Distinguishing Passive Staking from Active Trading: The bill clearly distinguishes “passive staking” from active participation activities such as buying, selling, and trading, establishing a differentiated tax treatment framework for different types of cryptocurrency income.
The legislative progress of the PARITY Act remains unclear for now. Although there are rumors in the industry that Congress may introduce a “Reconciliation Bill” that includes tax measures, President Trump has also already released his 2027 fiscal year budget request, but whether any cryptocurrency provisions can ultimately be included in any enacted tax legislation remains highly uncertain.
That said, signals from within the industry are clear: once any tax legislation that could become law is on the table, the cryptocurrency industry will fully push for the inclusion of related provisions. The PARITY Act’s reintroduction lays a more concrete documentary foundation for the industry’s policy demands during this tax legislative cycle.
In the December 2025 draft, the $200 threshold originally mainly applied to regulated payment stablecoins and was associated with the GENIUS Act. The March 2026 version changed the standard for determining whether to not recognize gains or losses to “cost basis not less than 99% of the redemption value,” which in substance provides a broader de minimis framework for eligible stablecoin transactions and no longer relies on a fixed dollar threshold.
Wash sale rules prohibit investors from buying back the same or substantially similar asset within 30 days after selling at a loss, and using that loss for tax deductions. Currently, this rule is applied in the U.S. stock market, but cryptocurrencies have not yet been included. If the bill passes, investors would not be able to indefinitely generate book tax losses through wash sale operations at year-end, and existing tax planning strategies would need to be adjusted accordingly.
The bill is still at the discussion draft stage and has not entered the formal legislative process. Progress depends on how quickly the U.S. Congress advances overall tax legislation and whether cryptocurrency provisions can be included in a tax reconciliation bill that could be advanced. The industry plans to actively lobby during the upcoming tax legislative cycle, but specific outcomes are still difficult to predict.
Related Articles
SEC Crypto Shift Clarifies Rules Without Blanket Approval
Polish lawmakers want to overturn the president’s veto of the cryptocurrency bill but failed again in their latest attempt to push it through.
Polish Parliament Fails to Override President's Veto on Crypto Law; PM Alleges Russian Interference
White House Mediates Clarity Act Stablecoin Dispute, Witt Reveals Legislative Timeline
Hong Kong SFC Investment Committee Warns Prediction Market Trading May Constitute Illegal Gambling
Economist Proposes National USD Stablecoin to Eliminate Currency Controls in Venezuela