Everyone says AI problems are solved? I don't thin

Question

TokenStorm · Accepted Answer

Cutting off interfaces, I've said this before—it's just closing your ears to steal a bell. On-chain data shows no decrease in junk content traffic. Who still believes in this?

---

If data quality isn't improved, no matter how many interfaces are cut, it's all in vain. There are no signs of technical improvement.

---

Honestly, this is a typical case of treating the symptoms but not the root cause. We need to first backtest the credibility of these data sources.

---

Ha, it's that trick again—just cutting an interface to pretend the problem is solved. The safest place in the storm, right?

---

Low-quality content should be either removed or not. Without an upgraded verification mechanism, you'll still get caught in a wave later.

MEVHunterWang · Answer

Shutting down the interface and thinking it will be a one-time fix? You're overthinking it. Whether to generate garbage data or not, it's just a superficial fix.

SnapshotDayLaborer · Answer

Well said, this is just a typical "fix" of cutting leek-style, treating the symptoms but not the root cause, old tricks all over again.

Closing an interface and claiming the problem is solved—do they really think we're all fools? Garbage content still floods the scene.

Without improving data quality, merely cutting connections is useless; it has to start from the source.

This ecosystem is now supported by rotten data; who dares to truly believe what's inside?

TheMemefather · Answer

Haha, it feels like a "fix" in the style of cutting leeks. It really can fool people.

Just turning off the interface and pretending to solve the problem? Laughable. Garbage content still floods in everywhere.

Data is fundamentally rotten; can simply cutting off a few lines save the day? No chance at all.

People who rely on this stuff for decision-making need to wake up. Can you really trust this information?

JustHodlIt · Answer

Cut it out, isn't this just closing your ears to steal a bell? The data garbage is still there, just move it somewhere else.

ServantOfSatoshi · Answer

Ha, it's that same routine of "just disconnect the interface and it's done." Do they really think we're fools?

The real solution still depends on the robustness of the data source itself. Why are there so many AI spam contents filled with powers on the screen now?

MEVSandwichVictim · Answer

Ha, still fooling yourself. The mess of data sources hasn't changed at all.

---

Cutting off an API just to pretend it's resolved? Wake up, everyone.

---

Instead of cutting off access, it's better to first understand what the data actually is.

---

Low-quality AI is everywhere, and the problem hasn't been solved at all; it's just turning around.

---

The credibility of the information isn't even guaranteed, and you're making decisions based on it? That's gambling.

---

Treating the symptoms but not the root cause is fine, but who in the ecosystem really cares about data quality?

---

The moment I shut down the API, I knew it was just an emergency measure.

RealYieldWizard · Answer

Just closing an API to whitewash? I spit on that. Treating the symptoms but not the root cause is a joke. Garbage data is still garbage.

The data source is broken. What can shutting down one API do? There are ten more waiting behind.

No one really wants to solve the real problem; it's all just a bluff.

MerkleTreeHugger · Answer

It's the same old trick of cutting the leeks. Just by disconnecting an API, you think you can fool everyone? That's hilarious.

Trending Topics

ContentMiningRevampPublicBeta

MiddleEastTensionsEscalate

CryptoRegulationNewProgress

GameFiSeesaStrongRebound

FedRateDecisionApproaches

Hot Gate Fun

USDS

USDS

踏马的人生

踏马的人生

玥来玥好

玥来玥好粉丝币

B

BCOIN

PINGUIN

PINGUINSQUAD

Pin