Bloomberg: The US-Iran war has limited impact on Bitcoin, which remains range-bound between 60,000 and 70,000 dollars. Hyperliquid contracts become a hedge indicator.

After the U.S. military launched airstrikes on Iran, Bitcoin briefly dropped to around $63,000 over the weekend, then rebounded above $70,100, leaving no clear signs of panic or safe-haven flows. Bloomberg suggests that the most evident risk signal during this geopolitical event actually came from the perpetual contracts on the crypto platform Hyperliquid linked to oil and gold, which hit record high open interest.

(Background: U.S.-Iran Tensions Escalate! BTC briefly dips below $65K, Gold and Silver surge again)
(Additional context: Looking back at Bitcoin in 2025: Why did ‘Digital Gold’ disappoint investors?)

Table of Contents

Toggle

• Bitcoin only made a “round trip” during the airstrikes
• Market structure explains Bitcoin’s muted response
• Hyperliquid commodity contracts become the weekend “price discovery” venue
• Crypto trading platforms are evolving into multi-asset speculative venues
• The role of Bitcoin is being redefined

Tags: Bitcoin has long been promoted as offering functions beyond traditional markets: a 24/7, real-time reflection of global risk appetite. However, during the geopolitical shock of U.S. airstrikes on Iran, this promise faced a harsh reality test.

Bitcoin only made a “round trip” during the airstrikes

When news of the U.S. attack on Iran broke over the weekend, Bitcoin briefly dipped from its pre-airstrike levels to about $63,000, then fluctuated. By Monday, Bitcoin had recovered to around $70,100, a daily increase of about 6.7%, even surpassing pre-airstrike levels.

Throughout the conflict, Bitcoin’s net movement was upward, with no signs of sustained panic selling or large inflows of safe-haven capital.

Market structure explains Bitcoin’s muted response

The reason behind this is closely related to changes in market structure. Since the “10/10 Liquidation Event” in October 2025, Bitcoin has fallen roughly 50% from its highs and has been consolidating in the $60,000 to $70,000 range. During this period, many leveraged positions were forcibly liquidated, retail participation declined significantly, and capital inflows remained weak.

With speculative positions greatly reduced, external shocks naturally have less follow-through effect.

Hyperliquid commodity contracts become the weekend “price discovery” venue

Notably, the clearest market signals during this geopolitical event did not come from Bitcoin but from commodity derivatives on crypto trading platforms.

On platforms like Hyperliquid, perpetual contracts linked to oil, gold, and silver surged notably over the weekend, echoing the traditional market’s risk rotation after Monday’s open—energy prices rising, demand for precious metals increasing.

Flowdesk OTC trader Karim Dandashy told Bloomberg that Hyperliquid played a “price discovery” role this weekend, with futures linked to traditional assets hitting “all-time highs” in open interest.

According to data from provider Hydromancer, the total trading volume of the silver-linked perpetual contract on Hyperliquid reached $28.28 billion. The oil-linked contract, launched only in early January this year, has already seen nearly $400 million in volume. While these figures are still modest compared to Bitcoin’s market size, they show a steady growth trend.

Crypto trading platforms are evolving into multi-asset speculative venues

In recent months, as gold and silver continued to strengthen while crypto assets remained relatively weak, more native crypto traders have shifted toward commodity-linked contracts, chasing momentum or expressing macro views without leaving crypto platforms.

Ryan Watkins, co-founder of crypto investment fund Syncracy Capital, told Bloomberg that these commodity and stock index-linked perpetual contracts mainly serve crypto-native traders seeking cross-asset speculation in familiar venues. He added that this trend accelerated after the October 2025 historic liquidation event, driven by the continued underperformance of cryptocurrencies relative to stocks and commodities.

Of course, not all capital flows are driven by prudent macro allocations; some trades are clearly speculative. But this is also part of the evolution of the crypto market—platforms are gradually expanding from pure token trading to include multi-asset speculation involving oil, metals, and stock indices.

Bitcoin’s role is being redefined

Bitcoin is no longer monopolizing the crypto market’s attention during times of stress; instead, it has become one option among a broader toolkit of speculative instruments—and not always the most active one.

For a market long claiming to be a “Wall Street alternative,” this incident highlights a deeper reality: Under geopolitical pressure, the most meaningful signals in crypto markets are actually coming from tools most closely tied to traditional finance.