On February 26, the Uniswap governance community approved a key proposal to expand the protocol fee conversion mechanism to eight additional blockchains and automatically charge fees on all v3 liquidity pools by default. Driven by this positive development, UNI has risen approximately 15% in the past 24 hours, significantly outperforming Bitcoin and Ethereum during the same period, as the market prices in an upgrade to its tokenomics model.
According to the proposal, the new mechanism will replace the manual activation of fee conversion on individual pools with a layered v3 fee system, and will unify fee collection through the v3OpenFeeAdapter. This means that newly created v3 liquidity pools will have fee conversion enabled by default, expanding the protocol’s revenue capture across multiple chains and covering more long-tail trading pairs.
The core logic of fee conversion involves reallocating part of the trading fees from liquidity providers to the protocol treasury, used for UNI buybacks, token burns, and treasury accumulation, thereby creating a more direct link between trading volume and token value. Estimates suggest this adjustment could generate an additional approximately $27 million in annual revenue, which, combined with the current annual burn scale of about $34 million, significantly enhances the deflationary outlook for the Uniswap token.
Data shows that since the gradual resumption of fee conversion at the end of 2025, over $5.5 million has been burned, and the protocol’s profitability has begun to improve. According to DeFi Llama, Uniswap recorded approximately $3.12 million in gross profit in the first quarter of 2026, ending several quarters of near-zero profitability and reflecting a shift in DeFi protocol revenue structures.
However, increasing protocol fees may also impact liquidity competition on Layer-2 networks. For high-frequency traders and market makers, fee sensitivity is high; if costs rise, some liquidity may shift to other protocols with lower fees. Therefore, the future price trajectory of UNI will still depend on key factors such as multi-chain trading volume growth, the sustainability of protocol revenue, and the strength of UNI token burns.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
UNI Rallies as Federal Court Ends Investor Case Against Uniswap Labs
Uniswap Labs won a full dismissal with prejudice, ending the investor lawsuit over scam-token losses and barring plaintiffs from refiling the same claims.
UNI rose about 6% to around $3.92 after the ruling, as traders reacted to the case being permanently closed.
UNI price rose about 6% to $
CryptoNewsFlash45m ago
Federal Judge Dismisses Final Claims Against Uniswap Labs, Ending Four-Year Class Action Over Scam Tokens
Federal court ruled Uniswap is not liable for scam tokens traded by third party issuers.
The judge found no proof that Uniswap had knowledge of fraud or helped deceptive schemes.
The four year class action ends with
CryptoNewsLand5h ago
Uniswap Beats Class Action Over Allegations It Aided Rug Pulls
Uniswap Labs and its founder Hayden Adams secured a decisive legal victory in a four-year dispute that challenged the decentralized exchange’s role in allegedly enabling scam tokens. A Manhattan federal judge, Katherine Polk Failla, dismissed the class-action suit against Uniswap with prejudice,
CryptoBreaking11h ago
U.S. Court Rules: Uniswap is Not Responsible for Scam Tokens; Open-Source Smart Contracts Are Neutral Tools
A New York federal judge dismissed the class-action lawsuit against Uniswap, ruling that open-source smart contract developers are not responsible for third-party scam tokens. This sets a legal precedent for the DeFi industry. The judge emphasized that Uniswap is a neutral tool, and developers must clearly distinguish themselves from illegal activities. The ruling provides legal protection for open-source software and encourages users to conduct their own risk assessments.
動區BlockTempo13h ago
Uniswap Token Scam Collective Lawsuit Wins, Open Source Developers' Indemnity Established
The Southern District Court of New York dismissed the class-action lawsuit against Uniswap Labs, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to adequately allege that the defendants were aware of the fraud or violated consumer protection laws. The court emphasized that open-source developers should not be held responsible for third-party misuse. This ruling provides legal protection for DeFi developers and clarifies the boundaries of liability for scams.
MarketWhisper13h ago
US Judge Dismisses State-Law Claims in Uniswap Scam Token Lawsuit
A federal judge has dismissed the remaining state-law claims against Uniswap Labs and founder Hayden Adams, closing a long-running class action that sought to hold the decentralized exchange (DEX) developer liable for scam tokens traded on its protocol.
CryptopulseElite13h ago