Crypto users lost tens of millions of dollars in January to address poisoning and signature phishing scams, as attackers exploited lower transaction costs and user inattention to steal funds at scale.
Scam Sniffer Warns of Spike in Address Poisoning Losses
Crypto wallet scams intensified in January, with address poisoning and signature phishing attacks driving significant losses, according to data from blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer.
In one of the most striking cases, a single victim lost $12.2 million after mistakenly copying a malicious address from their transaction history. The incident followed a similar address poisoning attack in December that resulted in roughly $50 million in losses.
Scam Sniffer reported that address poisoning remains one of the most reliable methods for draining large sums from crypto wallets. Attackers create addresses that match the first and last characters of a trusted wallet, while subtly altering the middle portion, making them difficult to spot at a glance.
Alongside address poisoning, signature phishing attacks also surged in January. Scam Sniffer estimates that $6.27 million was stolen from 4,741 victims through malicious signature requests, marking a 207% increase compared to December. Notably, just two wallets were responsible for 65% of all signature phishing-related losses during the month.
Unlike address poisoning, signature phishing relies on tricking users into signing harmful blockchain transactions, such as granting unlimited token approvals or authorizing fund transfers without realizing the consequences.
Analysts believe the recent rise in attack volume may be partly linked to Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrade, rolled out in December. By reducing transaction costs, the upgrade made it cheaper for attackers to send large numbers of dust transactions, lowering the barrier to running address poisoning campaigns at scale.
Read more: SEC Sounds Alarm as Crypto Scammers Flood Group Chats With AI-Powered Cons
Security firms continue to urge users to double-check wallet addresses, avoid copying addresses from transaction histories, and carefully review signature requests before approving them, as these attack methods show no signs of slowing down.
FAQ 🚨
- What is address poisoning in crypto?
Scammers send look-alike wallet addresses to trick users into copying the wrong one.
- How much was lost to these scams in January?
Victims lost tens of millions, including a single $12.2 million address poisoning case.
- Why did signature phishing spike sharply?
Attackers exploited user inattention, stealing $6.27 million via malicious signatures.
- What’s driving the rise in these attacks now?
Lower transaction fees made large-scale scam campaigns cheaper and easier to run.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
A user signed a malicious authorization transaction, resulting in approximately $280,000 in stablecoins being transferred.
Users fell victim to phishing attacks by signing malicious Permit transactions, losing approximately $280,000 in USDC and USDT to phishing attackers. The victim address is 0xB20d4Cd049B1A65Bc0475D29060Fe54fa0981607, with multiple phishing addresses involved in the incident.
GateNews5m ago
Bamboo Union Gang Hongrenhuida Members Turning on Each Other! Dissatisfied with Crypto Circle Agent Job-Hopping, They Set Up a Frame to Rob 330,000 USDT, Prosecutors Seek 23 Years
The Taipei District Prosecutors Office has concluded its investigation into a robbery case. The principal suspect Li You-kuan, through a dealer who switched sides to set up and deceive the victim through fraudulent means and violent coercion, forced the victim to transfer 330,000 USDT. The prosecution has indicted 8 suspects and recommended heavy sentences. This case reflects the lack of regulation in the virtual asset market, allowing underground forces to intervene, resulting in frequent "crypto circle black-on-black" incidents.
ChainNewsAbmedia14m ago
$500 Million Vulnerability Controversy: White Hat Hacker Accuses Injective of Delayed Response and Bounty Reduction
Crypto security researcher al_f4lc0n has accused the blockchain project Injective of slow communication in handling a critical security vulnerability and disputes over the bug bounty amount. The vulnerability originates from a defect in the sub-account verification mechanism, threatening over $500 million in assets. al_f4lc0n failed to receive the deserved bounty, raising questions about Injective's security governance.
GateNews50m ago
$172 Million Bitcoin Mysteriously Disappears: Surveillance Camera Steals Seed Phrase, CZ Warns of Self-Custody Security Risks
British businessman Ping Fai Yuen is suing his ex-wife for stealing his Bitcoin seed phrase and transferring assets worth approximately $172 million. The case is currently under court review, involving legal issues related to privacy surveillance and asset misappropriation. This incident highlights security vulnerabilities in the self-custody model of crypto assets.
GateNews55m ago
Cryptocurrency Crime Surges in Spain's Basque Region: Fraud, Kidnapping, and Money Laundering Cases Skyrocket, Police Urgently Upgrade Tracking Systems
Cryptocurrency-related crimes are rapidly rising in Spain's Basque region, with police investigating 541 cases involving fraud, money laundering, and other offenses. Social media platform Instagram has become a major channel for scams, prompting police to establish a cross-departmental task force to address the issue. Regulatory authorities emphasize the need to enhance market transparency and user protection to balance innovation and security.
GateNews57m ago
