Why hasn't the $1 billion USD ETF XRP yet made a breakthrough for the market?

XRP spot ETF funds have surpassed the $1 billion USD assets under management (AUM), with a total of approximately $1.14 billion USD allocated across 5 issuing organizations. The total net capital flow since November 14th is currently around $423.27 million USD.

On the same CoinGlass data table, XRP is trading around $1.88 USD, with a market capitalization of approximately $114.11 billion USD, and a 24-hour spot trading volume of about $382.14 million USD.

If investors are still operating under the “Bitcoin ETF mindset,” where ETF demand and revaluation are almost tightly linked, then this data set might seem paradoxical.

But in reality, that’s not the case.

This is a reminder that ETFs do not automatically push prices higher. They merely direct demand through a very specific mechanism.

Only when these “pipelines” withdraw real supply from the market faster than the supply can return, will prices be forced to react. Otherwise, AUM can still grow impressively while the underlying assets continue to trade based on other dynamics.

AUM does not equal new buying pressure

The simplest way to explain this misalignment is: many see AUM increasing and assume it’s new money coming in.

But the most important variable for price is not the AUM figure on the headline, but the speed and persistence of net creations (net creations). This is when new capital forces authorized participants to buy XRP off-market, issue additional ETF shares, and “lock” XRP into the fund structure – where they are not continuously rotated like retail wallets.

When separating AUM from net creations, the story becomes less ambiguous and purely mechanical.

And that’s good news, because mechanics are trackable.

AUM is an advertisement, net creations are the engine

AUM can increase for many reasons unrelated to new capital inflows during that week.

If XRP’s price rises, the ETF’s AUM also increases. If market makers preload inventory when the ETF launches, initial AUM can look very large, even before steady allocation begins.

Even active secondary market trading—those “pretty” volume figures reported—mostly just involve ETF shares being bought and sold among investors, not necessarily additional XRP purchases off-market.

Conversely, net creations are part of the ETF machinery that must directly touch the underlying asset.

According to CoinGlass data, if AUM is around $1.14 billion USD and net flows since mid-November are $423.27 million USD, it’s clear that a large portion of this AUM has not come from new money in recent weeks.

The rest could be early positions, pre-seeded inventory, and market price fluctuations—all valid—but they do not necessarily indicate a steady increase in buying pressure that tightens supply.

How much XRP is “being pulled” from the market by ETFs?

Converted to token count, at roughly $1.88 USD/XRP, $1.14 billion USD is approximately 600 million XRP held via ETFs.

Compared to the circulating supply of about 60.67 billion XRP, this accounts for nearly 1%.

1% is significant. It represents a real “storage vault,” expanding access and creating a new group of investors.

But it’s not large enough to trigger a one-way squeeze.

Bitcoin is the clearest comparison. By the end of 2025, US spot Bitcoin ETFs hold about 1,298,757 BTC, representing 6.185% of the total 21 million BTC supply.

This ratio explains why the Bitcoin ETF story is more linear: when a large portion of supply is locked in non-tradable structures, the rest must be traded at higher prices to maintain demand.

For XRP, the “ETF footprint” is smaller, so the “warehouse effect” (warehouse effect) is also less pronounced.

Not to mention, a significant part of the $1.14 billion USD AUM comes from price volatility, not just pure net creations.

Capital flow speed: steady but not overwhelming

$423.27 million USD over about 35 days averages roughly $12 million USD per day.

With a token that regularly records hundreds of millions USD in daily spot volume, this is a stable demand force, impactful at the margins but not enough to automatically dominate price formation.

This also explains why “launch day” figures can be misleading.

Canary’s (XRPC) XRP spot ETF reportedly saw over $46 million USD in trading on the first day, with about $26 million USD in just the first 30 minutes, according to Bloomberg.

These figures show the ETF is attracting attention and has good liquidity—crucial for building an ETF segment.

But they do not reveal how many new shares are actually created, how much secondary trading occurs, or how much market makers rotate inventory.

The first lesson—and often overlooked—is: AUM is a snapshot at a point in time, while net creations are flows.

It’s these flows that have the biggest impact on price.

Lock-up schedules and hedging activities “cool” demand

Even accepting the reality of XRP ETFs, questions remain: what other factors absorb that demand without causing chart reactions?

For XRP, the supply schedule is a key part of the answer.

Ripple has locked 55 billion XRP in on-chain escrow contracts, with a maximum release of 1 billion XRP per month; unused amounts are re-locked.

The issue isn’t that exactly 1 billion XRP are sold each month—because that’s not the case—but that the market always lives with a predictable supply rhythm. This directly influences how liquidity providers price risk and how willing they are to chase prices when demand appears.

Legal factors also play a role. The SEC ended its lawsuit with Ripple in August 2025, maintaining a $125 million USD fine and restrictions on sales to institutions.

This removes a major cloud but doesn’t turn XRP into a fully “smooth” institutional asset overnight.

Finally, there’s the hedging layer—something most retail investors don’t see clearly.

ETF share creation isn’t just pure spot buying without hedging. Authorized participants and market makers often buy spot XRP while simultaneously selling futures or perpetuals to hedge risk and lock spreads.

When this hedging layer is deep enough, part of the genuine demand is offset by synthetic selling pressure, preventing spot prices from reacting as expected.

By 2025, the hedging toolkit for XRP will be more familiar to institutional desks. CME plans to launch XRP futures settled in cash on May 19, 2025, pending legal approval.

On CoinGlass, the XRP derivatives market is sizable enough to serve this role: open interest around $3.40 billion USD and 24-hour futures volume of about $2.56 billion USD.

Conclusion: ETFs are ready but not “flooding”

All factors considered, the sideways price movement of XRP is no longer a contradiction.

A $1.14 billion USD ETF structure, representing about 1% of circulating supply, can coexist with a flat or noisy chart when net creations are steady but not overwhelming, supply follows a clear schedule, hedging is strong, and liquidity is fragmented across multiple venues.

For the ETF growth in XRP to become as tightly linked to spot price as Bitcoin, the market needs:

– Net creations to accelerate enough to surpass normal sell-offs

– Hedging layers to start unwinding rather than increasing

– Deeper, cleaner onshore liquidity, where marginal demand faces fewer barriers

In other words, ETFs need to shift from being a “new access portal” to a continuous supply absorption machine.

Until then, the $1 billion USD mark for XRP ETF remains notable—but not because of expectations for an immediate revaluation.

It shows that XRP ETFs have passed the testing phase and become habitual.

It shows advisors and brokerage accounts now have a simpler way to hold XRP.

And it shows that when market sentiment improves, infrastructure for a major rally is in place.

The pipelines are there.

They are leading water—yet not causing a flood.

Vương Tiễn