Solv Protocol Migrates to Chainlink CCIP from LayerZero

SOLV-6.58%
LINK4.16%
ZRO0.84%
BTC2.28%

Bitcoin-centric DeFi platform Solv Protocol announced on Thursday that it will migrate to Chainlink from LayerZero, citing security concerns following industry incidents. The protocol will phase out LayerZero’s bridging support for SolvBTC and xSolvBTC on Corn, Berachain, Rootstock, and TAC, designating Chainlink’s CCIP as its official cross-chain infrastructure solution for over $700 million in assets, according to Solv’s announcement post.

Migration Rationale

Solv stated that it reviewed its existing bridges and determined that CCIP provided “the strongest security assurances through its secure-by-default architecture, native risk controls, and proactive monitoring.” The protocol noted that CCIP is widely considered the “gold standard” for decentralized interoperability and is officially recognized by the White House as critical digital asset infrastructure.

In its announcement, Solv emphasized the sensitivity of cross-chain bridges in DeFi: “Cross-chain bridges remain one of the most sensitive and high-risk areas in DeFi, with insecure bridges bringing systemic risk to the entire industry. Recurring industry-wide security incidents have made this explicitly clear and reinforced the standard that all projects require the interoperability solution with the most robust security and decentralization.”

Industry Context: Kelp DAO Exploit

Solv’s migration follows a $292 million exploit on LayerZero-powered Kelp DAO last month. According to reports, the attacker, suspected to be North Korea’s Lazarus Group, exploited a single-verifier configuration of an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) bridge to drain 116,500 rsETH from Kelp DAO.

The exploit created significant bad debt on the Aave protocol. LayerZero and Kelp DAO subsequently blamed each other over the bridge configuration. LayerZero criticized Kelp DAO’s 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN) setup, stating it had warned against such a configuration. Kelp DAO countered that the single-verifier setup was LayerZero’s default onboarding recommendation, noting that 47% of LayerZero apps use the single-verifier setup. Earlier this week, Kelp announced it would also drop LayerZero in favor of Chainlink for cross-chain infrastructure.

Solv did not mention Kelp’s exploit or migration in its announcement, instead focusing on its own security assessment.

Solv’s Security History

Solv itself experienced a security incident in March of this year, when approximately $2.7 million was drained from one of its Bitcoin Reserve Offerings (BRO) token vaults.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
QuietRugAlarmvip
· 05-08 17:03
Switching from LZO to LINK, Solv's move is quite decisive; the crypto world is just that pragmatic.
View OriginalReply0
Don'tMessWithSlippage.vip
· 05-08 15:05
Safety is no small matter; choosing the wrong cross-chain bridge can be very costly. Looking forward to Chainlink's performance.
View OriginalReply0
MintLiquidationWarningvip
· 05-08 05:11
This incident with LayerZero really made people sweat, and switching Solv to Chainlink can be considered a timely stop-loss.
View OriginalReply0
TheTreeInTheCenterOfMistValleyvip
· 05-08 04:52
Projects that were previously using LayerZero are now probably re-evaluating, a butterfly effect.
View OriginalReply0
BlackVelvetKeychainvip
· 05-08 04:50
Chainlink's CCIP is indeed much more stable, and Solv's move wasn't too late.
View OriginalReply0
SaveABitOnGasFeesvip
· 05-08 04:49
Migration costs are not low, but it's worth it for user fund security.
View OriginalReply0