
GH/s, or gigahashes per second, is a unit of computational power that measures how many billions of hash calculations a device or mining pool can perform each second. Hashing is the process of generating a “digital fingerprint” for data. The faster a device can attempt hashes, the greater its chances of meeting the validation requirements for a block.
A hash function converts any input into a fixed-length output. Hashrate is the number of hash attempts per second. In GH/s, “G” stands for “giga,” meaning one billion; therefore, 1 GH/s equals 1,000,000,000 hashes per second.
In cryptocurrency mining, GH/s measures a device’s capacity to participate in Proof of Work (PoW) consensus. Proof of Work relies on computational power—whoever first discovers a hash meeting the protocol's requirements earns the right to add a new block and receive rewards.
During competition among mining pools and across the network, higher GH/s means more hash attempts per second and, theoretically, a higher probability of earning rewards. However, actual results also depend on total network hashrate and mining difficulty—the latter reflects how small a target value must be achieved, often requiring more attempts on average.
These units all measure hashrate at different magnitudes:
In practice, Bitcoin mining hardware typically uses TH/s to describe device hashrate; the network’s total hashrate is usually reported in EH/s. GH/s is more common for smaller devices, test measurements, or situations where finer granularity is needed.
The core factor is the proportion of your hashrate to the network’s total hashrate. A higher share increases your expected portion of block rewards. However, real earnings also depend on factors like coin price, electricity costs, mining difficulty, and pool fees.
Example: Step 1: Suppose your miner has a hashrate of 1 GH/s and the entire network’s hashrate is 500 EH/s (5×10^20 hashes/sec; Blockchain.com reports hundreds of EH/s in 2024). Step 2: Your share ≈ 1×10^9 / 5×10^20 = 2×10^-12. Step 3: About 144 Bitcoin blocks are produced per day (one every 10 minutes). Expected daily blocks ≈ 144 × 2×10^-12 ≈ 2.88×10^-10 blocks/day—effectively negligible.
This shows that with only 1 GH/s in the Bitcoin network, mining solo yields no practical returns. Substantial earnings typically require hardware rated in hundreds of TH/s and participation in a mining pool or staking-based platform products. Any earnings calculations are expectations only—not guarantees.
GH/s is usually measured via the device dashboard and mining pool backend; minor discrepancies between them require calibration.
Step 1: Check real-time hashrate on your device dashboard—it reflects instantaneous speed but fluctuates frequently. Step 2: View the mining pool’s reported average hashrate (e.g., over 15 minutes, 1 hour, or 24 hours), calculated based on “valid shares” and thus more accurately reflecting your actual contribution. Step 3: Cross-check “rejected shares/expired shares.” High rejection rates lower your effective GH/s below the device’s rated specification. Step 4: Run the device stably for at least 24 hours. Use longer-term averages to calibrate device configuration and network connection quality.
If readings remain low over time, check cooling systems, power supply stability, network latency, and ensure the mining pool’s connection port and region are optimal.
For identical GH/s performance, differences in power consumption translate into different operational costs. Efficiency is commonly expressed as J/TH (joules per terahash), or more granularly as J/GH.
The formula is: efficiency = power consumption (J/s) ÷ hashrate (hashes/sec). For example: if a miner consumes 3,000W (3,000 J/s) at 100 TH/s, efficiency ≈ 3000 / (100×10^12) = 30 J/TH. Converted to J/GH: ≈0.03 J/GH.
Given known electricity rates, you can estimate daily energy costs: electricity cost ≈ power (kW) × hours used × rate per kWh. Compare this with expected returns based on your GH/s to assess profitability.
GH/s universally measures “attempts per second,” but hardware requirements and efficiencies vary greatly by algorithm. Bitcoin uses SHA-256 with ASIC miners highly optimized for it. Ethereum (before the merge) used Ethash and was more suited to GPUs measured in MH/s.
Therefore, always consider the algorithm when evaluating GH/s. The same GH/s may have vastly different energy use and costs on SHA-256 versus other algorithms; hardware is not interchangeable. Always verify algorithm compatibility when selecting devices.
On Gate’s platform, GH/s appears in mining instructions or specifications for hashrate-based products. Here’s how to interpret it:
Step 1: On PoW token pages, monitor “network hashrate” and “difficulty” to understand unit relationships between GH/s, TH/s, and EH/s. Step 2: For cloud mining or miner rental products, confirm the units used (GH/s or TH/s), settlement cycle, and fee structure—check whether rewards are based on “effective hashrate.” Step 3: Review assumptions in earnings examples (token price, difficulty level, fees, electricity costs). Convert GH/s into your expected network share to avoid being misled by nominal hashrate claims. Step 4: Refer to risk disclosures and terms provided by the platform for compliance information and fund security requirements.
Don’t focus solely on GH/s—also consider efficiency and operational costs. High GH/s with high energy consumption may be unprofitable.
GH/s measures how many billions of hashes are attempted each second—essentially your frequency of participating in Proof of Work competition. Its significance should always be understood relative to total network hashrate and difficulty; GH/s alone offers limited insight. When choosing devices or products, evaluate GH/s alongside efficiency ratings, supported algorithms, electricity costs, fee structures, operational stability, and always rely on effective hashrate reported by mining pools. Exercise caution when funds are involved—earnings are never guaranteed and all risks are assumed by the user.
All are units of computational power—ordered from smallest to largest as MH/s < GH/s < TH/s < PH/s < EH/s. The conversion is straightforward: 1,000 MH/s = 1 GH/s; 1,000 GH/s = 1 TH/s; and so forth. Understanding these relationships lets you quickly compare different miners or hashrates.
The stated 100 GH/s is an ideal maximum; actual earnings are typically lower due to several factors: pool fees (usually 1–3%), network latency causing wasted shares, thermal throttling reducing performance during overheating, and fluctuations from difficulty adjustments. Check real-time hashrate data on Gate to pinpoint any discrepancies between expected and actual results.
High hashrate is only one factor; profitability also depends on energy costs and coin price. For example: if your miner runs at 100 GH/s with an 800W power draw at $0.07/kWh electricity cost (converted from RMB), daily electricity could exceed your mining revenue—resulting in a loss. Thus efficiency (hashrate per watt) is more important than absolute hashrate when choosing miners.
The definition of GH/s (one billion hashes per second) is universal—but actual coin production varies due to differences in mining difficulty between coins. For example, the same device at identical GH/s will yield different amounts when mining BTC versus BCH; lower-difficulty coins may provide higher returns. Use Gate’s platform to compare coins’ difficulty for optimal profitability.
Advancements in chip manufacturing can boost hashrate by about 30–50% at similar power levels—but actual improvements depend on algorithm optimization. Upgrading from 7nm to 5nm chips could raise GH/s from around 100 to approximately 130–150 with only modest increases in power draw. Beginners should focus on products featuring the latest process technology for better long-term returns.


