Head exchanges have always adopted a horse racing mechanism, where subsequent investments are linked to project performance—this logic is actually quite clear. Resources are tilted towards high-quality projects, and poor-quality projects naturally exit, allowing market screening to occur naturally. To put it simply, those who can stand out and have more impressive data will receive key support. This approach may seem harsh, but in fact it is particularly beneficial for the entire ecosystem. Project teams are motivated to innovate, and as a result, the ecosystem becomes increasingly rich, forming a virtuous cycle. The more diverse the ecosystem, the more vibrant it becomes, and the ecosystem continues to flourish.