Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
Gate MCP
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
This is not meant to be FUD, genuinely looking for insights here:
I’d love to see this work, but can someone explain how founders across the space are extremely cautious about their tokens being classified as securities, which is obviously leading to massive token vs equity misalignment, while companies like @PreStocks and @xStocksFi are openly tokenizing securities and making them tradable and accessible onchain where you can't even KYC the buyers?
I’m in close contact with several founders trying to solve this, and their legal counsel is very clear: avoid anything that suggests 1:1 backing or rights to underlying assets.
So either these teams have figured out a compliant structure that the rest of the industry hasn’t…
Or a combination of parabolic price action, missing third-party attestations and questionable legal footing ain't going to end well.
Let’s hope it’s the former.