This project with 50k stars on GitHub has encapsulated Buffett and Munger's stock-picking logic into an Agent—I spent a night studying it and want to share my honest thoughts.

Project link:
【What it does】
18 investment masters' Agents are running simultaneously: Buffett, Munger, Cathie Wood, Michael Burry, Nassim Taleb, Stanley Druckenmiller… Each has their own investment philosophy and risk control preferences, providing independent judgments.
The last "Manager Agent" consolidates all their "arguments," making a final call: buy / sell / hold.
You can run backtests, input ticker and time period, and see how this virtual team performs on historical data.
This is not a toy. The architecture is serious.
【How I use Claude to do similar things】
I haven't run the code for this project myself, but I’ve been using this "multi-framework arguing" approach with Claude.
Here's how I do it:
Give the same question to Claude, but each time set a different "role."
For example, when researching whether a narrative is worth betting on, I ask in three rounds:
First round: "You are Nassim Taleb, analyze this narrative using tail risk and antifragility frameworks."
Second round: "You are Cathie Wood, analyze the same narrative using technology adoption curves and disruptive innovation frameworks."
Third round: "You are a cynical hedge fund short seller, find all the vulnerabilities."
Then I compare the three answers, look for overlaps and disagreements, and make my judgment.
It's not about AI giving me the answer—it's about AI playing different thinking frameworks to force me to think clearly.
I believe this workflow is ten times more useful than just asking "Is this worth investing in?" directly.
【Its limitations need to be clarified】
This project is for educational purposes, not a real trading tool.
It uses US stock data; for crypto assets, you'd need to change the data source yourself.
More importantly: the "souls" of the masters are trained on public data; the real Buffett's judgments come from decades of corporate research and private information. This Agent provides a "style simulation," not a "wisdom replication."
But on the other hand—being able to turn these different thinking frameworks into readily accessible tools is already enough.
【So my conclusion is】
The power equality in computing is truly happening, but it doesn't mean AI will replace your investment decisions.
What it can do is turn the "multi-angle stress testing" that only top institutions could afford into a tool accessible to everyone.
You still need to judge for yourself, but before that, you can hear more diverse voices—this is a significant change. If you're interested, check out 👀
#ai #investing