Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I just came across an interesting number: Nancy Pelosi's wealth is now estimated to have grown to about $271 million. Of course, this raises questions that need to be asked.
When you look at how some members of Congress conduct their stock trades, it eventually becomes questionable. Nancy Pelosi's wealth at this level—many rightly wonder how it relates to her votes and decisions in Congress. It's not just about her personally, but about a larger pattern.
The discussion is actually simple: if politicians trade based on information they have through their position, then it's a real conflict of interest problem. Nancy Pelosi's wealth and the associated stock transactions are just one example among many.
Many are therefore calling for stricter rules—such as members of Congress not being allowed to trade individual stocks at all or that everything should be documented much more transparently. This would prevent such questions from arising in the first place.
Transparency in politics is truly essential. Without it, citizens cannot understand what conflicts of interest might be at play. The debate over Nancy Pelosi's wealth is ultimately also a debate about the credibility of our political institutions.