In traditional law, you don't pick your own judge. I think ERC 8183 fails here by letting the paying party choose the evaluator.


This setup invites collusion and self evaluation. If a buyer picks the judge, they will always pick someone who refunds their money.
@BosonProtocol uses a smarter design inversion. The seller selects the Dispute Resolver. You might wonder why. It's because the seller needs to earn your trust to get paid.
- Sellers pick credible judges to attract buyers.
- Bad judges mean no one commits funds.
- Market pressure ensures fairness.
I'm backing $BOSON because it uses real game theory. You get a neutral marketplace instead of a biased escrow.
Learn more:
BOSON7,52%
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin