Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
In traditional law, you don't pick your own judge. I think ERC 8183 fails here by letting the paying party choose the evaluator.
This setup invites collusion and self evaluation. If a buyer picks the judge, they will always pick someone who refunds their money.
@BosonProtocol uses a smarter design inversion. The seller selects the Dispute Resolver. You might wonder why. It's because the seller needs to earn your trust to get paid.
- Sellers pick credible judges to attract buyers.
- Bad judges mean no one commits funds.
- Market pressure ensures fairness.
I'm backing $BOSON because it uses real game theory. You get a neutral marketplace instead of a biased escrow.
Learn more: