Who was just next door opening a 50,000 Bitcoin long position, and then was deemed to be "manipulating the market"?
Come on, read me the definition of market manipulation.
Can't recall it, right?
Because it doesn't exist. It's made up.
517 coins, gone just like that.
It's not a liquidation; liquidation is your own choice. This is confiscation—you have remaining coins in your account that haven't been liquidated yet, and they are taken directly.
The reason is: you manipulated the market.
So what does it mean not to manipulate the market? Is losing money the only indicator of not manipulating? Is unrealized profit the original sin?
The most explosive part of this isn't the big trader.
It's the comment section.
Someone actually said: It must be him who violated the rules first; the platform wouldn't do it without reason...
Wake up.
If you try to justify yourself today, tomorrow that reason will be used against you.
—
Exchanges are not courts.
They don't need evidence, hearings, or a grace period for appeals.
They only need a backend button and a statement that says "All final interpretations belong to the platform."
Today, you laugh at big traders leveraging to the max.
Tomorrow, you open a 2x position, make some U, and want to withdraw—
517 coins? You don't need that many. 517U can ruin your holiday.
—
Someone said: I won't use a second-tier platform; I'll go to the top-tier.
Top-tier platforms definitely don't dare to do this openly.
But they've unplugged the internet cable. They've crashed the servers. They make the market freeze like a PPT right before your stop-loss.
It's not only confiscation that counts as theft.
Making you unable to move, then watching it slowly zero out—that's theft too.
—
So what have I been watching these past two years?
Not which platform is more "conscientious."
But which platform hasn't even installed this button.
The code doesn't have a "freeze" function. The contract doesn't say "All final interpretations belong to the platform."
If you make a profit, you keep it. If you want to leave, just leave. The project team is right there, and the permissions are in the hands of the users.
This isn't idealism.
It's the difference between a casino and a racetrack.
The casino owner can kick you out.
But not at a racetrack. You're riding your own horse.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Who was just next door opening a 50,000 Bitcoin long position, and then was deemed to be "manipulating the market"?
Come on, read me the definition of market manipulation.
Can't recall it, right?
Because it doesn't exist. It's made up.
517 coins, gone just like that.
It's not a liquidation; liquidation is your own choice. This is confiscation—you have remaining coins in your account that haven't been liquidated yet, and they are taken directly.
The reason is: you manipulated the market.
So what does it mean not to manipulate the market? Is losing money the only indicator of not manipulating? Is unrealized profit the original sin?
The most explosive part of this isn't the big trader.
It's the comment section.
Someone actually said: It must be him who violated the rules first; the platform wouldn't do it without reason...
Wake up.
If you try to justify yourself today, tomorrow that reason will be used against you.
—
Exchanges are not courts.
They don't need evidence, hearings, or a grace period for appeals.
They only need a backend button and a statement that says "All final interpretations belong to the platform."
Today, you laugh at big traders leveraging to the max.
Tomorrow, you open a 2x position, make some U, and want to withdraw—
"Detected abnormal trading behavior, account frozen."
What abnormal? No idea.
When will it be lifted? When notified.
517 coins? You don't need that many. 517U can ruin your holiday.
—
Someone said: I won't use a second-tier platform; I'll go to the top-tier.
Top-tier platforms definitely don't dare to do this openly.
But they've unplugged the internet cable. They've crashed the servers. They make the market freeze like a PPT right before your stop-loss.
It's not only confiscation that counts as theft.
Making you unable to move, then watching it slowly zero out—that's theft too.
—
So what have I been watching these past two years?
Not which platform is more "conscientious."
But which platform hasn't even installed this button.
The code doesn't have a "freeze" function. The contract doesn't say "All final interpretations belong to the platform."
If you make a profit, you keep it. If you want to leave, just leave. The project team is right there, and the permissions are in the hands of the users.
This isn't idealism.
It's the difference between a casino and a racetrack.
The casino owner can kick you out.
But not at a racetrack. You're riding your own horse.
—
#Vanar 's AI sounds like a technical narrative.
But what I focus on is one thing:
They write "memory" onto the chain, immutable.
Today, it records the history of AI behavior.
Tomorrow, it will record the ownership of assets.
Once recorded clearly, no one can change it.
The world has never feared strict rules.
What it fears is rules made up on the spot, with the rule-makers still sitting across from you betting.
The lesson bought with 517 coins—don't buy it for nothing.