2026-01-20 08:27:02

I have a point to raise: regarding the changes in Genius points, some say everyone has decreased and it's no big deal. But this logic actually doesn't hold up.

The project team clearly aims to attract new users and generate buzz through activities. The initial plan was quite aggressive—register and get 500 GP instantly, with additional rewards for invitations. This approach seems tempting, but where's the problem? Once the event ends, these users who took advantage of the free offers basically leave. User stickiness hasn't been established, and the devaluation of points becomes inevitable. So it looks like "everyone has decreased," but fundamentally, the project's incentive logic was flawed from the start—there's a contradiction between short-term user acquisition and long-term retention, and in the end, they just use inflation to fill this gap.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 01-23 03:22

It's the same old trick again: short-term token dumping and long-term leek farming. Just look at the data to see where the problem lies.

View OriginalReply0

ZkSnarker

· 01-20 16:02

ngl the "everyone got slashed so it's fine" cope is peak crypto cope. they literally designed their own game of musical chairs then act surprised when the music stops lol

Reply0

NightAirdropper

· 01-20 08:50

Basically, this is like drinking poison to quench thirst. In the beginning, they spend heavily to attract people, and in the end, they have to use inflation as a scapegoat. I've seen this trick many times.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_survivor

· 01-20 08:42

Basically, it's like drinking poison to quench thirst—it's only a matter of time.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretDiary