The pseudonymity-versus-trust dilemma is real in crypto dealings. On one hand, privacy is a cornerstone of Web3. On the other hand, when you're entering into financial commitments or service agreements with someone operating under a veil of anonymity—no camera, no verifiable identity—the risk asymmetry becomes problematic. You're essentially extending credit or trust into a void. If obligations go unmet or payments don't materialize, your recourse options shrink dramatically. It's not about disrespecting privacy preferences; it's about acknowledging that anonymous interactions fundamentally shift the risk profile. The question isn't whether anon should be allowed, but rather: how do we build mechanisms that let both privacy and accountability coexist in Web3? Smart contracts, reputation systems, collateral requirements—these are partial answers. But the tension remains until the ecosystem develops better tools for trustless verification.