2026-01-20 06:25:13

Once someone hits 100 million dollars, they're basically set for life. The interest alone would let them live in pure luxury forever. So why not recalibrate California's wealth tax downward? It could actually make the whole system feel more equitable. This is worth the conversation.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-23 03:49

Speaking of 100 million, it's really enough to relax for a lifetime... But how does that logic suddenly turn into equitable when it comes to tax reduction? Reverse brainwashing, right?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-21 15:40

10 billion still not enough? That's hilarious, this logic is truly brilliant.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 01-20 18:21

100 billion is just the starting point, right? That logical flaw is a bit too big.

View OriginalReply0

LowCapGemHunter

· 01-20 06:54

10 billion sounds great, but have you calculated the inflation, brother?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 01-20 06:54

Honestly, this logic is as flawed as a sieve... Can $1 million in interest really fund a luxurious lifetime? Whose money are they using as a cushion?

View OriginalReply0

BankruptWorker

· 01-20 06:54

Ha, earning a million dollars in interest and you can just relax? Bro, did your math teacher teach you sports?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-20 06:51

Sounds nice, but in reality, it's just about wanting to cut taxes for the wealthy. That logic is just too far-fetched.

View OriginalReply0

MentalWealthHarvester

· 01-20 06:48

Honestly, I find it hard to believe the logic that one hundred million dollars can just make you relax and do nothing.

View OriginalReply0

StakeHouseDirector

· 01-20 06:33

One hundred million dollars just lying around earning interest? Bro, how did your logic get flipped like that... Can tax cuts still be called fairness?

View OriginalReply0