Why are so few Bitcoins entering DeFi? Frankly, the problem boils down to trust.



Currently, most methods of integrating Bitcoin into DeFi all revolve around one key link—the custodian. You have to trust a third-party entity in order to let your Bitcoin flow within DeFi. This additional trust requirement gradually becomes the biggest bottleneck.

It also makes sense. Users originally entered DeFi to achieve decentralization, but instead, they have to rely on an institution to hold their assets, which is a bit of a facepalm. Under this model, no matter how attractive the returns are, the risk is always there.

Because of this pain point, trustless Bitcoin vault solutions have emerged. The core logic is simple—eliminate the custodian and directly address the trust issue through technical means. This way, Bitcoin holders can truly participate in DeFi with peace of mind, without bearing additional counterparty risk.

This approach is quite meaningful. Once the trust bottleneck is broken, the liquidity of trapped Bitcoin is expected to be truly unleashed, and the DeFi ecosystem can open up to more possibilities.
BTC2,63%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunter420vip
· 01-22 07:29
Honestly, I just don't want to give my coins to a third party, nobody is naive. Custodian? Forget it, isn't that just a different way to cut the leeks? A trustless solution sounds good, but I'm worried it might be another new trap. The core issue with BTC entering DeFi is still the lack of technical trustworthiness, it has nothing to do with money. Why does it feel like another round of hype? Where are the truly usable solutions? Instead of waiting for some breakthrough, it's better to keep your coins in a cold wallet and be at ease. Liquidity release? Let's first solve the security issues, there's no rush.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkepticvip
· 01-20 06:00
It's the same old story with the custodian—basically, they're just deceiving us.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweepervip
· 01-20 05:46
lol trustless btc vaults are just cope... they'll find new ways to rugpull us anyway
Reply0
SillyWhalevip
· 01-20 05:41
Basically, it's still the same old problem: dressing up decentralization with centralized intentions. It's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWangvip
· 01-20 05:35
Basically, it's a vicious cycle. Non-custodial is truly decentralized. The current solutions are all self-deception.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin