Recently, I revisited Dusk Network, and the more I ponder, the more I feel that the market's assessment of this project might be biased.
Many people only see the "privacy" label and think of privacy coins, but what $DUSK is actually doing is much more complex—closely integrating compliant finance with privacy computing. What does this mean for traditional financial institutions? It ensures privacy while avoiding violations, which in itself builds a very difficult-to-cross moat.
Look at how many projects are just telling stories now, but very few can truly solve real financial problems. Dusk's value isn't in market sentiment fluctuations but in whether it can become one of the infrastructures for on-chain real assets. Such infrastructure often develops slowly and is not flashy, but once its value is realized, it’s hard to replace.
There is indeed a lot of market noise, and short-term volatility is normal, but this is precisely an opportunity to filter out good projects.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 7h ago
Damn, everyone has been fooled by the shell of privacy coins, but actually Dusk is playing a different game.
Tokens like BNB/ETH have long been priced in, and it's the infrastructure projects that quietly make huge profits that are truly remarkable.
Wait, do institutions really use this stuff?
Oh, I see, it's about who gets the first position to eat the pie.
That's a good point, but the key is when we can see real applications.
This might really be an opportunity to buy the dip, but it depends on whether there will be progress later on.
The combination of compliance and privacy is indeed rare, but the market just hasn't caught on yet.
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMiner
· 7h ago
Most people just look at the privacy coin label and call it a day, never considering how tough the combination of compliance and privacy really is.
The market for truly practical infrastructure projects is not interested, yet these are exactly the most valuable.
Short-term sideways movement is normal, just a bit frustrating, but isn’t this the time to scoop up bargains?
I’m optimistic about Dusk’s long-term prospects, but right now it’s a bit dull... need to wait a bit longer.
The market is full of story traders, but this guy is actually doing real work.
The concept of a moat is correct; compliant finance needs this kind of approach.
There are very few projects domestically and internationally that can combine privacy and compliance to build infrastructure, which is quite interesting.
If Dusk really takes off this round, the latecomers who wake up late will probably chase the highs again, haha.
It’s still cheap now, be patient and wait.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-addcaaf7
· 7h ago
To be honest, I haven't paid much attention to Dusk before, but now it seems I underestimated it.
The real moat is right here—compliance + privacy are fundamental needs.
Infrastructure projects like this are always the cheapest when no one is paying attention.
I'm optimistic about this direction, but we still need to wait and see how it gets implemented.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 7h ago
I've experienced the 2018 privacy coin wave, and now it's happening again? Compliance + privacy sounds like a perfect story, but would traditional financial institutions really use it? Honestly, I remain skeptical.
Infrastructure projects are indeed often underestimated. The problem is, how many projects ultimately end up as Ponzi schemes... The risks involved need to be carefully considered.
Short-term volatility filters for good projects—ha, I've heard this line too many times. But I have to admit, when it comes to execution, projects with actual action are quite scarce.
The issue isn't with Dusk itself, but with how difficult it is to reach real application. Let's not talk about other things; we can discuss surviving this bear market later.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLover
· 7h ago
Hmm... I really haven't thought about it from that angle. Compliance + privacy is indeed a rare combination.
A moat makes sense, but it's only meaningful if you survive until that day.
How many times have we heard the story of infrastructure? The key is that someone has to pay.
But this wave of decline might actually be a good time to get on board...
Wait, how's the liquidity of this thing right now?
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfer
· 7h ago
Alright, but what I care more about is whether this thing's LP yield can outperform the permissionless finance projects... Privacy + compliance sound sophisticated, but practical implementation is the key.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 8h ago
It's the same old story... Compliance + Privacy + Moat, all sound right, but I just want to ask: when will this stuff appear in the trading volume of exchanges?
Recently, I revisited Dusk Network, and the more I ponder, the more I feel that the market's assessment of this project might be biased.
Many people only see the "privacy" label and think of privacy coins, but what $DUSK is actually doing is much more complex—closely integrating compliant finance with privacy computing. What does this mean for traditional financial institutions? It ensures privacy while avoiding violations, which in itself builds a very difficult-to-cross moat.
Look at how many projects are just telling stories now, but very few can truly solve real financial problems. Dusk's value isn't in market sentiment fluctuations but in whether it can become one of the infrastructures for on-chain real assets. Such infrastructure often develops slowly and is not flashy, but once its value is realized, it’s hard to replace.
There is indeed a lot of market noise, and short-term volatility is normal, but this is precisely an opportunity to filter out good projects.