2026-01-17 08:21:55

This project's market performance is indeed worth paying attention to. From on-chain data, recent selling pressure mainly comes from retail investors, while early participants' large addresses remain relatively stable. Especially those new wallets that were heavily linked at launch, which still have a high concentration.

To gauge the project's true attitude, you can start by monitoring the movements of these key wallets: the first address 0x3f24fc8598b7888d2fef1192102fe65f786ec7f8 and the second address 0x85a6b5042264b2bbf259569bc6702b8b01468a4e. Tracking their selling pace will be crucial—if these concentrated addresses start to distribute their holdings, it signals a clear risk. Conversely, if they continue to hold or make small transactions, it indicates confidence remains.

It is recommended to follow the changes in these key addresses before deciding your position strategy. Whether the project team is genuinely working or just harvesting profits, on-chain data never lies.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketSurvivor

· 7h ago

It's the same old trick of monitoring addresses... Basically, it's just gambling on whether the casino owner won't run away. Is this really reliable? In the early days, what stability do big whales have? Swap to another wallet, and no one can tell. On-chain data is transparent, but people's intentions are hard to read. It's better to just see if the coin price can break above the previous high; everything else is nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Whisperer

· 7h ago

Is it this again, just watching a few addresses and trying to predict the trend? Look, small investors selling off is normal operation; only when big players hold steady does it get interesting. If those two addresses really dared to dump, they would have done it already. Why wait until now? On-chain data is transparent, no doubt, but reading the data depends on skill. Most people are just watching for entertainment. Instead of digging into addresses, it's better to ask yourself how much capital you can withstand a pullback.

View OriginalReply0

failed_dev_successful_ape

· 7h ago

Large holders not fleeing indicates there is still hope; small investors cutting losses is the usual operation. --- On-chain data looks okay, but I'm worried that large addresses might secretly disperse their holdings, then it's game over. --- You want me to monitor wallets again? Bro, I’m too familiar with this routine; in the end, trusting your own judgment is the best. --- Honestly, watching address movements is more reliable than reading whitepapers. --- This kind of analysis is solid; the key is that retail investors always react the slowest. --- Early large holders stabilizing the situation is indeed a good sign. --- Is it possible they never intended to run and are just waiting to pump the price? --- On-chain data really doesn’t lie, but the way you interpret it can be misleading.

View OriginalReply0

ruggedSoBadLMAO

· 8h ago

Retail investors swing their knives, while big players remain unmoved. What a difference... Wait, can we really trust these two addresses? Could they also be just a front? Large holdings remaining stable mean confidence? I always feel like they know something we don't. I've heard this monitoring method too many times, and in the end, I still end up losing...

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-afe07a92

· 8h ago

Haha, it's always about looking at on-chain data to find the truth. Doing this every time has also worn out my patience. Just wait and see. Once those two addresses take action, they definitely won't escape. I've long seen through small retail investors dumping, I'm just worried that big whales might suddenly turn hostile.

View OriginalReply0