2026-01-17 08:21:41

Pulled in 2.5k recently and honestly I'm pretty satisfied with that. Not here to complain, but the numbers tell an interesting story about how the algorithm works. When I had 1.3 million more engagements, I made 25% more—that's the real difference. Still, I've got nothing but appreciation for this platform and what it's done for creators like me.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainDecoder

· 3h ago

Data shows that engagement is indeed a key variable, but there is an interesting logical trap here — 1.3 million interactions only yield a 25% increase in revenue. Calculated, the marginal effect is clearly diminishing. It’s worth noting that the platform’s allocation mechanism may have some form of nonlinear design.

View OriginalReply0

FlippedSignal

· 3h ago

Algorithms are really awesome. Losing over a million in engagement only results in a 25% decrease in earnings. That gap is a bit outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingSerious

· 3h ago

2.5k is okay, but the key is that engagement really requires some finesse.

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 4h ago

well actually™ if you're not correlating engagement metrics with gas optimization dynamics, you're missing the non-trivial arbitrage opportunity here. empirically speaking, that 25% delta screams algorithmic rent extraction lol

Reply0