#数字资产市场动态 $DUSK and $OM are both on my watchlist. Looking back, the prices of these RWA concept coins hovered around 0.17 initially. Later, when they dropped to 0.12, I chose to exit — honestly, watching these projects is like watching an entrepreneur full of ambition but with a weak foundation: lots of ideas, big ambitions, but not much real capital to make it happen. There's a bit of a gap between imagination and execution.
That said, if $DUSK can come up with something truly impressive — whether it's a technological breakthrough or ecosystem progress — I wouldn't rule out the possibility of getting back on board. After all, there's nothing wrong with the RWA direction itself; the key is whether the team can get things done.
Pure personal review, not to be taken as any investment advice.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshi
· 23h ago
0.12 Cutting losses was really painful, but now I think it's still a matter of execution.
---
Honestly, there's nothing wrong with the RWA direction; I'm just worried the team talks big but doesn't get things done.
---
Back then, I thought 0.17 could take off, but what happened... Imagination is only useful if you have the money to back it up.
---
$DUSK if it really has black technology, I wouldn't mind re-entering, but the prerequisite is that it has real stuff.
---
Cutting losses is easy, getting back in is hard. Let's see how it performs later.
---
These two projects are still in the ambitious stage.
---
Projects with poor execution, no matter how good the idea, are useless.
---
Let's wait and see if there are any surprises; otherwise, I'll stay on the sidelines.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 23h ago
Well, execution capability is indeed a weakness.
---
I was also considering whether to buy the dip at 0.12, but in the end, I didn't dare.
---
The RWA direction is fine, just worried that the team lacks stamina.
---
No matter how good the idea is, without money, it's useless. That's the reality.
---
Let's wait until DUSK presents some substantial content; otherwise, it's just hype.
---
You're so right. The gap between imagination and execution is a huge pit.
View OriginalReply0
BearEatsAll
· 23h ago
0.12 when I didn't buy the dip, now I'm kicking myself hard
---
A project with poor execution is useless no matter how good it sounds. $DUSK's turnaround depends entirely on subsequent actions
---
The RWA concept is fine, but most teams are just bragging
---
I've also watched these two coins fall from their highs, honestly it's a bit disappointing
---
Wait until $DUSK shows real progress before considering, for now let's stay on the sidelines
---
The idea is good, but the key is that there's no money and no one to do it
---
Deciding to exit was the right move, after all, there wasn't much impressive performance later
---
RWA is the future direction, but current projects are still too immature
---
If we had held on a bit longer back then, we might have doubled our investment
---
A reliable team is the key, everything else is just empty talk
View OriginalReply0
LightningLady
· 23h ago
0.12 That wave was missed, which is a bit regrettable, but honestly, it's still a matter of execution capability.
---
RWA direction is fine, just worried it might turn into another PPT wealth creation scheme.
---
Let's wait until DUSK really has products; for now, it's just a pie-in-the-sky stage.
---
Entrepreneurs have ideas but no money; in the crypto world, this is the best way to cut leeks.
---
I'm also paying attention, but these two projects need to show real results before I can consider re-engaging.
---
Falling from 0.17 to 0.12 was really a rollercoaster; team, give us some real stuff.
---
The gap between imagination and execution—this metaphor is excellent; there are a bunch of these in the crypto world.
---
If I weren't optimistic about RWA itself, I would have already removed it from my watchlist.
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeek
· 23h ago
Early exit is considered wise; running away at 0.12 is indeed reliable.
Somewhat regret not chasing the follow-up of DUSK; should we wait for real progress before deciding?
Well said, these kinds of projects are no different from pie-in-the-sky plans; it all depends on who can truly implement them.
The execution problem is indeed a common issue with RWA projects... too many castles in the air.
Feels like those still observing have all become mice; by the time RWA truly matures, it might already be gone.
#数字资产市场动态 $DUSK and $OM are both on my watchlist. Looking back, the prices of these RWA concept coins hovered around 0.17 initially. Later, when they dropped to 0.12, I chose to exit — honestly, watching these projects is like watching an entrepreneur full of ambition but with a weak foundation: lots of ideas, big ambitions, but not much real capital to make it happen. There's a bit of a gap between imagination and execution.
That said, if $DUSK can come up with something truly impressive — whether it's a technological breakthrough or ecosystem progress — I wouldn't rule out the possibility of getting back on board. After all, there's nothing wrong with the RWA direction itself; the key is whether the team can get things done.
Pure personal review, not to be taken as any investment advice.