2026-01-17 07:34:00

Stablecoin payment applications have always been an important direction for blockchain adoption. Recently, a dedicated settlement layer public chain built specifically for USDT has shown impressive performance. Through zero-fee transfers and EVM compatibility, it has made significant breakthroughs in this track.

A few data points make this clear: since its official launch, this chain has processed over 75 million transactions. The stablecoin supply has surpassed $7 billion, indicating that the ecosystem is truly gaining users. Even more interestingly, it has become the second-largest market on Aave, which demonstrates strong lending demand.

The tokenomics design is also worth noting. The project allocates 40% of the total tokens directly into ecosystem incentives to support liquidity pools and developers. Such incentive mechanisms can indeed attract participants, and it's no surprise that the token price has performed well recently as the ecosystem takes shape.

From wallet integration to regional expansion, this chain is methodically advancing its ecosystem layout. The Asia-Pacific prioritized strategy also reflects the project's thoughtful market considerations. To establish a foothold in the stablecoin track, technical capabilities alone are not enough; ecosystem operation and user accumulation are essential. The project's progress is gradually validating this approach.

AAVE0,93%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AlgoAlchemist

· 3h ago

Zero fees are a bit of a joke. It's not that there are truly no costs; they've just shifted the costs elsewhere. I'm already tired of this trick.

View OriginalReply0

PerennialLeek

· 3h ago

Zero fees? Now that's the right way. Other chains are still out there cutting leeks. --- 70 billion stablecoin supply indicates that people are indeed using it, unlike some projects that just shout slogans. --- Aave's second-largest market is quite telling; the demand for lending and borrowing is really strong. --- 40% of tokens are allocated to ecosystem incentives. That's a bold move, but whether it can be implemented depends on the follow-up. --- I think the Asia-Pacific priority strategy is a good move; this is truly a blue ocean. --- 750 million transactions sound like a lot, but we need to ask how the daily active users are doing. --- Token prices are rising along with the ecosystem, which makes sense logically. --- Expanding from wallet endpoints to regional expansion sounds quite orderly, but operational capability is the real test. --- Is the stablecoin track competitive? It seems like lately everyone is just trying to see who has the lowest transaction fees. --- If the technology isn't enough, you have to rely on ecosystem operations. There's nothing wrong with that statement.

View OriginalReply0

ApeShotFirst

· 4h ago

Wow, zero-fee transfers? This is the coolest thing I've heard. 700 million stablecoin supply... Why didn't I get on board earlier? Aave's second-largest market, this data is pretty impressive.

View OriginalReply0

GhostChainLoyalist

· 4h ago

Zero fees are truly unbeatable, but to be honest, ecosystem operation is really the key to winning.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropJunkie

· 4h ago

Zero fees? That's what players want. Can it really work? Wait, Aave's second-largest market? These numbers are impressive. 40% ecological incentives directly invested. I've seen this approach before, but it seems to be working. The Asia-Pacific priority strategy is quite clever. Understands the market.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaskVictim

· 4h ago

Zero fees? Wait, is that true? Then where did the transaction fees go? A stablecoin supply of 7 billion USD sounds impressive, but how is the ecosystem depth? Aave's second-largest market... does Arbitrum have to step aside? Honestly, allocating 40% of tokens to ecosystem incentives isn't a bad idea; it just depends on how long it can sustain. Asia-Pacific first? Another round of regional competition?

View OriginalReply0