Regarding the issues of high Gas fees and transaction speed on Ethereum, these have always been the core pain points restricting on-chain application experiences. Recently, in the evolution of Layer2 solutions, architectures based on off-chain processing combined with on-chain settlement are rapidly emerging.
From a technical perspective, the core advantages of these solutions lie in three aspects: First, a significant increase in throughput. With a sidechain processing architecture, a single chain can handle thousands of transactions per second, achieving approximately a 100-fold performance improvement compared to the Ethereum mainnet. Interaction latency issues in applications such as DeFi transactions, NFT creation, and on-chain gaming have been basically resolved.
Second, a substantial reduction in fee costs. Due to transaction aggregation and settlement, on-chain costs are distributed across many transactions, reducing actual Gas fees to about 1% of the mainnet level. This makes small transactions that previously required high fees now economically feasible.
Third, the expansion of ecological capacity. Currently, more than 30 projects are deployed on related Layer2 networks, with daily transaction volumes exceeding 100 million, indicating a genuine market demand for such solutions.
From an investment perspective, ecosystem tokens typically carry liquidity incentives and governance functions, with token value positively correlated with ecosystem development. In the current acceleration of Layer2 deployment, technically advanced solutions with first-mover advantages are indeed worth paying attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainMelonWatcher
· 11h ago
Really? A 1% gas fee sounds too good to be true. I have to try it myself to believe it.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiac
· 11h ago
Sounds good, but what can the numbers like 30 projects and 100 million daily trading volume really prove? It all depends on the retention rate.
---
A 100x performance boost sounds great, but the question is who will ensure that this incentive mechanism doesn't repeat past mistakes?
---
I'm tired of the argument that ecosystem tokens are positively correlated with ecosystem development. The key is how governance rights are distributed; otherwise, it will eventually become a tool for big players to harvest retail investors.
---
Lower fees to 1%? What about chain security? Has anyone seriously run stress test data?
---
Layer2 is indeed popular, but those betting on first-mover advantage should be cautious—EOS was also hyped up like that back in the day.
---
Instead of focusing on token value, it's better to see whether the proposal process is truly decentralized—that's the fundamental to how far it can go.
---
Throughput improvements are indeed a hard metric, but I'm more concerned about how emergency mechanisms are designed in case of major vulnerabilities.
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPudding
· 11h ago
L2 is really here. Gas fees have dropped from sky-high prices to affordable levels, and you no longer need to worry about those few dollars in transaction fees.
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapist
· 11h ago
Gas fees drop to 1%? About time, those sky-high transaction fees before were really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 12h ago
Layer 2 is really the savior, the mainnet gas fees are ridiculously high, finally someone can cure this tumor.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 12h ago
Gas fees reduced to 1%? That's quite a bold claim, everyone who has actually used it knows the truth.
Layer2 is indeed great, but I'm worried it might become the next EOS.
Over 30 projects sound impressive, but do people really use these projects?
Token value is directly related to ecosystem development, which means are we just taking over? Haha.
The first-mover advantage, just look at Arbitrum and Optimism.
Honestly, I'm more concerned about when the mainnet will truly become affordable.
Early adopters definitely made a lot of money, but is it still worth entering now?
Every day, the Savior of L2, feels like I've been hearing this for three years.
Regarding the issues of high Gas fees and transaction speed on Ethereum, these have always been the core pain points restricting on-chain application experiences. Recently, in the evolution of Layer2 solutions, architectures based on off-chain processing combined with on-chain settlement are rapidly emerging.
From a technical perspective, the core advantages of these solutions lie in three aspects: First, a significant increase in throughput. With a sidechain processing architecture, a single chain can handle thousands of transactions per second, achieving approximately a 100-fold performance improvement compared to the Ethereum mainnet. Interaction latency issues in applications such as DeFi transactions, NFT creation, and on-chain gaming have been basically resolved.
Second, a substantial reduction in fee costs. Due to transaction aggregation and settlement, on-chain costs are distributed across many transactions, reducing actual Gas fees to about 1% of the mainnet level. This makes small transactions that previously required high fees now economically feasible.
Third, the expansion of ecological capacity. Currently, more than 30 projects are deployed on related Layer2 networks, with daily transaction volumes exceeding 100 million, indicating a genuine market demand for such solutions.
From an investment perspective, ecosystem tokens typically carry liquidity incentives and governance functions, with token value positively correlated with ecosystem development. In the current acceleration of Layer2 deployment, technically advanced solutions with first-mover advantages are indeed worth paying attention to.