Recently researching the stablecoin ecosystem, I unexpectedly came across the XPL project. To be honest, I didn’t pay much attention at first, but the more I learn, the more interesting it becomes.
Its positioning is very clear—building a Layer1 public chain focused on stablecoin settlement. It sounds simple, but implementation is not easy. The highlight of XPL is its full compatibility with the EVM ecosystem, which means developers can migrate existing applications at low cost without starting from scratch. From a technical perspective, this kind of compatibility design indeed lowers the barrier to entry.
Why do I think it has a chance? The main reason is the market gap. Nowadays, more and more people are using stablecoins, but issues like cross-chain settlement, transaction costs, and confirmation speed have not been well addressed. Traditional public chain solutions are either underperforming or have incomplete ecosystems. Stablecoins need a dedicated settlement infrastructure, and XPL’s idea hits exactly this pain point.
Of course, having ideas alone is not enough; execution is key. Whether the project can attract enough stablecoin liquidity and whether the ecosystem can truly become active are still unknowns. Competitors are also working in this direction, so for XPL to stand out, real skill and effort are required.
Overall, the stablecoin settlement chain is a promising track. As one of the participants, XPL has its unique design approach and is worth continuous observation at this stage. Are you optimistic about this direction?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
airdrop_huntress
· 19h ago
EVM compatibility sounds good, but the real winners are those who can attract liquidity. Whether XPL can achieve this remains to be seen.
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusDegen
· 19h ago
The stablecoin settlement chain indeed has potential, but it depends on who can truly bring in liquidity; otherwise, it's just a castle in the air.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossiper
· 20h ago
Stablecoin settlement is indeed a blue ocean, but whether XPL can truly attract liquidity depends on its subsequent performance.
EVM compatibility is nothing new; the key is whether the ecosystem is active. Without real trading volume, even the best design is useless.
Let's wait and see who can first really reduce the cross-chain costs of stablecoins—that's the real trump card.
To put it simply, it's just another good story; execution is the critical factor. It's too early to draw conclusions now.
I'm a bit curious about XPL's funding background. Who are the investors? It seems to determine how far the project can go.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMe
· 20h ago
EVM compatibility is a common story, but from the perspective of stablecoin settlement chains, it's indeed fresh. It depends on how XPL attracts liquidity.
The idea of XPL is good, but I'm worried it's just another PPT public chain. Execution is the real test.
The market gap for stablecoins is indeed large, but competition has already become fierce. Why would XPL stand out?
Honestly, it's a gamble whether XPL can truly activate the ecosystem. No matter how good the hype is now, we have to wait for the data to speak.
EVM compatibility is fine, but the key is whether it can gain support from mainstream stablecoin players. That’s the line between life and death.
Cross-chain settlement is indeed a pain point, but many projects have already failed on this path. XPL might have ideas, but it may not outperform others.
This track is worth paying attention to, but I care more about who can first secure large liquidity, as that determines everything.
It sounds okay, but I’m just worried it will be another project that nobody mentions after a month.
Recently researching the stablecoin ecosystem, I unexpectedly came across the XPL project. To be honest, I didn’t pay much attention at first, but the more I learn, the more interesting it becomes.
Its positioning is very clear—building a Layer1 public chain focused on stablecoin settlement. It sounds simple, but implementation is not easy. The highlight of XPL is its full compatibility with the EVM ecosystem, which means developers can migrate existing applications at low cost without starting from scratch. From a technical perspective, this kind of compatibility design indeed lowers the barrier to entry.
Why do I think it has a chance? The main reason is the market gap. Nowadays, more and more people are using stablecoins, but issues like cross-chain settlement, transaction costs, and confirmation speed have not been well addressed. Traditional public chain solutions are either underperforming or have incomplete ecosystems. Stablecoins need a dedicated settlement infrastructure, and XPL’s idea hits exactly this pain point.
Of course, having ideas alone is not enough; execution is key. Whether the project can attract enough stablecoin liquidity and whether the ecosystem can truly become active are still unknowns. Competitors are also working in this direction, so for XPL to stand out, real skill and effort are required.
Overall, the stablecoin settlement chain is a promising track. As one of the participants, XPL has its unique design approach and is worth continuous observation at this stage. Are you optimistic about this direction?