2026-01-17 07:26:44

Capitol insiders are signaling a potential shift in support for landmark crypto legislation. According to recent reports, tensions between federal policymakers and major exchange executives have raised questions about the future of key regulatory frameworks aimed at the digital asset space.

The CLARITY Act—designed to establish clearer jurisdictional boundaries between securities and commodities regulators in crypto markets—is now facing scrutiny amid growing friction between the White House and leadership at prominent exchanges. Industry sources suggest that policy positioning on this legislation could depend on how negotiations between government officials and platform operators unfold in coming months.

This development reflects the broader challenge of balancing innovation advocacy with regulatory oversight in the crypto sector. Market participants are closely watching how these dynamics play out, as the legislative landscape remains fluid and sensitive to key relationships between public and private stakeholders.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MemeTokenGenius

· 01-19 17:45

Here we go again, when will there be a conclusion on the CLARITY Act? --- Is the White House and exchanges at odds? So retail investors just have to keep waiting? --- Promised clear regulation, but it still depends on political favor. Unbelievable. --- If this drags on, is it really beneficial... Feels like it will only get more complicated. --- It's all about利益博弈 (interest games), and in the end, the ones who suffer are us who are building positions. --- The federal side wants to regulate, but exchanges are uncooperative. Who's caught in the middle? --- If this policy really passes, will prices rise, or is it just another scenario where bad news is fully priced in before a rebound? --- Regulatory frameworks change every day, I don't even know how to plan anymore. --- Crypto bros, stay calm. This tug-of-war will probably last another six months.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHustler

· 01-18 04:58

Another internal conflict? When exchanges and governments clash, retail investors are the ones who suffer the most.

View OriginalReply0

OPsychology

· 01-17 18:21

It's the same old double-dealing trick... The White House and the exchanges each have their own stance, both trying to dominate crypto...

View OriginalReply0

RiddleMaster

· 01-17 07:42

Is the White House and the exchanges clashing again? It seems this CLARITY Act might be doomed.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 01-17 07:36

The CLARITY Act is probably going to fall this time. It seems to be the same old script—interest groups fighting, and ultimately the bill's provisions are completely overridden. --- This kind of "balancing innovation and regulation" sounds very comfortable, but history tells us that the result is often that no one really benefits. --- Negotiations between the White House and exchanges are the opposite of decentralization; the incentives are fundamentally incompatible. --- The real issue isn't how CLARITY is written, but that neither side truly wants to cede authority. --- If mechanism design isn't properly aligned, even the best bill is just a decoration. --- Can the exchanges make concessions? I doubt it. --- That's why I've always said crypto governance needs stricter constraints, not just relying on "relationships." --- It seems like it will be delayed until the next election cycle again, and everything will start over.

View OriginalReply0

0xOverleveraged