The Clarity Act's three pillars are creating major waves across the industry. First, the SEC and CFTC split on jurisdiction—most see this as a step forward for clarity. But then you've got the stablecoin yield restrictions, which is genuinely frustrating. Banks have been lobbying hard on this one, and the crypto community's pushback is real.
The real nightmare? DeFi developer liability provisions. That's where things get messy.
Top players in the space aren't holding back—they're calling this 'worse than the status quo' in its current form. The good news: the regulatory framework got postponed. That buys time. The next few weeks are critical. This is basically the decision point for whether the US doubles down as a crypto hub or steps back. Developers, traders, and protocol teams are all watching closely to see which direction things actually go.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityNinja
· 7h ago
The regulatory crackdown has finally been implemented, and DeFi developers are really going to be affected... The delay saved a life, but the restrictions on stablecoin yields are indeed annoying, and the banking brothers are causing trouble again.
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larry
· 7h ago
The DeFi developer responsibility clause is really a joke; banks have a strong lobbying presence. Now they've completely screwed over the entire ecosystem...
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighbor
· 7h ago
ngl clarity act this move feels like it's just to corner us, the restrictions on stablecoin yields are really outrageous
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaser
· 7h ago
Stablecoin yields are being cut, and banks are secretly exerting pressure again. This time, we really can't hold on anymore.
As soon as the DeFi developer responsibility clause was released, I knew it was the end. This isn't clarity legislation at all; it's a noose.
Does the US really want to become a crypto hub? Just look at the actions over the past few weeks.
The bank lobbying tactics are truly outrageous. Why should stablecoin yields be restricted? Does this logic even hold?
It's not over just because of the delay; it feels like even harsher measures are waiting in the wings.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 7h ago
NGL, the people at the bank are really disgusting. Limiting stablecoin yields just to protect their little interest, blaming DeFi developers is going too far.
The Clarity Act's three pillars are creating major waves across the industry. First, the SEC and CFTC split on jurisdiction—most see this as a step forward for clarity. But then you've got the stablecoin yield restrictions, which is genuinely frustrating. Banks have been lobbying hard on this one, and the crypto community's pushback is real.
The real nightmare? DeFi developer liability provisions. That's where things get messy.
Top players in the space aren't holding back—they're calling this 'worse than the status quo' in its current form. The good news: the regulatory framework got postponed. That buys time. The next few weeks are critical. This is basically the decision point for whether the US doubles down as a crypto hub or steps back. Developers, traders, and protocol teams are all watching closely to see which direction things actually go.