The precious metals market has been getting interesting lately—after rising for so long, it’s starting to recover. Gold, silver, and other metals are collectively weakening, leaving many people wondering about the reasons. Frankly, part of it is technical profit-taking, while another part is directly linked to the easing of geopolitical risks.



The situation in Iran has stabilized considerably, the US is currently adopting a wait-and-see attitude, and Russia has also sent some signals of de-escalation. As a result, the market’s tense risk-averse sentiment has eased somewhat, and funds that previously flooded into the gold market are beginning to withdraw. Short-term pressure naturally arises.

Industry insiders point out that this wave of adjustments in gold and silver essentially reflects the release of previously accumulated geopolitical risk premiums. Although this correction looks fierce, it is not enough to change the long-term upward logic of gold.

What’s even more worth paying attention to is the true attitude of institutions. They believe that, in the context of the global economy still full of uncertainties and the gradual easing of monetary policies worldwide, gold’s status as a safe haven and inflation hedge remains solid. By the end of the year, there’s still a chance for gold prices to surge toward the historic high of $5,000 per ounce. Of course, there will be many fluctuations and corrections along the way—that’s normal.

Looking deeper, factors such as increased multipolarization, heavier debt burdens, and the evolution of the monetary system could all drive gold into a new round of revaluation. The short-term easing of geopolitical risks is just a detour; the long-term story is far from over.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainDetectivevip
· 21h ago
Wait, I need to analyze the logical loopholes here... Talking about funds withdrawing to gold, but institutions are still watching 5000? This data doesn't match up. Can short-term easing really dissipate risk aversion? According to on-chain data, the allocation logic of large wallet holders hasn't changed at all in the past two weeks... It's a bit suspicious. The idea that geopolitical premium is being released is too superficial; we need to look at the actual fund flows to judge. It's too early to draw conclusions now. The expectation that gold prices will reach 5000 requires tracking the real position changes of major institutions. Can verbal optimism be the same as actual gold transactions?
View OriginalReply0
OPsychologyvip
· 01-17 07:01
Is it the same story again, blaming geopolitical easing for the sell-off? I think it's the institutions taking one last cut before clearing out their positions. Can the $5000 level be broken? Anyway, I don't believe this move will go smoothly.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologisvip
· 01-17 07:01
Geopolitical premium release, it's quite interesting... but this logic applied to gold still fundamentally reflects the eternal fate of safe-haven assets. Thinking back to the logic of ancient reserve metals, it hasn't really changed.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 01-17 07:01
Geopolitical premium is just being released. It looks fierce but actually isn't much, just like those false risk warnings in smart contracts, creating panic. The true long-term logic remains intact.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 01-17 06:47
Geopolitical easing has started to hit gold, and this tactic is really slick. But to be honest, those institutional folks have had their eyes on 5000 for a long time. A pullback is just a pullback; the long-term logic hasn't changed.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)