Many people still simply categorize Walrus as "another decentralized storage," but if you look at its recent product iterations, you'll find the approach is completely different. The Walrus Foundation openly states in its annual summary: launching the mainnet is just the appetizer; the real competition is making developers use it as smoothly as Web2, treating privacy and verifiability as default system configurations rather than optional features.
What I want to discuss most is why this matters—ultimately because it addresses three real pain points for developers.
**First Pain Point: Access Control**
The Seal module seems simple but is actually very hardcore. It brings permission management to the data layer—your data can not only be encrypted but also execute rules on-chain, precisely controlling who can view, modify, and how to authorize. This is especially critical for sensitive information like AI training data, medical health records, and DeFi trading strategies. Compared to old methods like post-audit or centralized gateways, Seal makes privacy a hard constraint from the architecture level.
**Second Pain Point: Fragmented Storage**
It sounds contradictory, but many projects' real dilemma isn't storing large files but the "small file hell"—thousands of images, configuration files, UI resources scattered everywhere. Quilt's solution is native API packaging capability, allowing a single operation to aggregate up to 660 small files into one unit. The official reports that it has already helped ecosystem partners save over 3 million WAL in storage costs. These hard metrics are more convincing than any promotional words—real projects are using it, real money is being saved.
**Third Pain Point: Distribution and Mobile**
Upload Relay, combined with the new TypeScript SDK, abstracts away the complex operation of "distributing data across multiple nodes." This is especially beneficial for scenarios where mobile networks often drop connections and resume transfers are difficult. The improvements are particularly noticeable. More and more underlying protocols are starting to value this approach of "helping developers pay off technical debt."
**The Ecosystem Is Also Starting to Speak with Numbers**
Forecasts show that the prediction market application Myriad has already processed over $5 million in trading volume, with all data verification completed on Walrus. From a broader perspective, the prediction market sector itself has a daily trading volume of up to $2.3 billion—only infrastructure capable of handling this data volume can truly emerge.
**Token and Economic Model**
WAL is currently priced around $0.1563, with a 24-hour trading volume of approximately $18.27 million, circulating supply of about 1.6 billion tokens, and a max total supply of 5 billion. It has increased by 9.1% over the past 7 days. The "deflationary design" emphasized by the team is also noteworthy—each network transaction destroys a portion of tokens, so the more people use it, the greater the scarcity pressure.
**Final Observation**
For protocols like Walrus, I think the key isn't just "how good the story is," but whether the three aspects—privacy protection (Seal), cost optimization (Quilt), and user experience (Upload Relay)—can truly drive active daily users and paid usage. From this perspective, the recent product rhythm is indeed moving in the right direction.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainBard
· 9h ago
It seems that Walrus is really holding back a big move, not just a project that talks big but doesn't deliver.
Saving 30 million WAL in costs really makes me feel good; real applications are hard currency.
I like the logic of the Seal module. Privacy is not just an embellishment but a fundamental infrastructure, and this is the right direction.
Myriad has reached a trading volume of $5 million? What does this indicate? The ecosystem developers truly have demand.
But honestly, it still depends on whether it can continue to attract new applications in the future. No matter how good the words sound now, it still relies on action.
View OriginalReply0
PumpBeforeRug
· 9h ago
Damn, Seal's permission management is really top-notch. Finally, someone has made privacy a hard constraint.
What are you waiting for? Myriad's $5 million trading volume didn't come out of nowhere.
I truly feel the pain of small file hell... 660 files packed into one unit, saving 3 million WAL? Damn, this is what solving real problems looks like.
But it still depends on whether the daily active users can pick up later; just having a story isn't enough.
A 9.1% increase isn't much; the key is whether the deflation mechanism can truly create scarcity.
I just want to know when this set of tools will be available for ordinary developers to use, instead of becoming a playground for big players.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullAlertOfficer
· 9h ago
Wow, Seal is really impressive. Making permissions into hard constraints is a whole different level.
---
The nightmare of small files really hits home; saving 3 million WAL in costs is quite interesting.
---
The problem is, no matter how good these features are, it depends on how many people actually use them. No matter how much the story is told, it’s all in vain.
---
Upload Relay is well abstracted, but how far it can go on mobile still depends on the data.
---
The deflationary design looks good, but I worry that without real demand to support it in the later stages, it might not hold up.
---
Myriad’s $5 million trading volume isn’t small, but with a 2.3 billion market scale, it needs to capture more to succeed.
---
Implementing privacy at the architecture level is definitely the right approach; Web3 has been working on this for a while.
---
Honestly, many decentralized storage projects have failed. Why would Walrus be different? Can Seal and Quilt turn the tide?
---
A 9.1% price increase is interesting, but it still depends on whether the application truly gains traction.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBro
· 9h ago
Looking at Walrus's latest iteration, it does have some real substance, but whether it can truly be implemented depends on whether developers will buy in.
Hard metrics speak volumes—cost savings of 3 million WAL and a trading volume of 5 million USD are undeniable.
Seal's approach sounds impressive, but whether privacy can be made into a hard constraint and truly popularized remains to be seen.
The angle of small file aggregation is interesting; it seems to address many projects' actual pain points.
The price of 0.1563 makes me a bit tempted, but it all depends on whether subsequent product implementations can keep up with the pace.
The deflationary design is quite aggressive; with more destruction mechanisms, it will depend on whether user growth can sustain it.
Ultimately, it's about whether privacy protection, cost optimization, and user experience can truly boost daily active users. Good words are one thing, but data speaks louder.
The storage track still seems to be looking for a way out; Walrus's approach is worth paying attention to.
Many people still simply categorize Walrus as "another decentralized storage," but if you look at its recent product iterations, you'll find the approach is completely different. The Walrus Foundation openly states in its annual summary: launching the mainnet is just the appetizer; the real competition is making developers use it as smoothly as Web2, treating privacy and verifiability as default system configurations rather than optional features.
What I want to discuss most is why this matters—ultimately because it addresses three real pain points for developers.
**First Pain Point: Access Control**
The Seal module seems simple but is actually very hardcore. It brings permission management to the data layer—your data can not only be encrypted but also execute rules on-chain, precisely controlling who can view, modify, and how to authorize. This is especially critical for sensitive information like AI training data, medical health records, and DeFi trading strategies. Compared to old methods like post-audit or centralized gateways, Seal makes privacy a hard constraint from the architecture level.
**Second Pain Point: Fragmented Storage**
It sounds contradictory, but many projects' real dilemma isn't storing large files but the "small file hell"—thousands of images, configuration files, UI resources scattered everywhere. Quilt's solution is native API packaging capability, allowing a single operation to aggregate up to 660 small files into one unit. The official reports that it has already helped ecosystem partners save over 3 million WAL in storage costs. These hard metrics are more convincing than any promotional words—real projects are using it, real money is being saved.
**Third Pain Point: Distribution and Mobile**
Upload Relay, combined with the new TypeScript SDK, abstracts away the complex operation of "distributing data across multiple nodes." This is especially beneficial for scenarios where mobile networks often drop connections and resume transfers are difficult. The improvements are particularly noticeable. More and more underlying protocols are starting to value this approach of "helping developers pay off technical debt."
**The Ecosystem Is Also Starting to Speak with Numbers**
Forecasts show that the prediction market application Myriad has already processed over $5 million in trading volume, with all data verification completed on Walrus. From a broader perspective, the prediction market sector itself has a daily trading volume of up to $2.3 billion—only infrastructure capable of handling this data volume can truly emerge.
**Token and Economic Model**
WAL is currently priced around $0.1563, with a 24-hour trading volume of approximately $18.27 million, circulating supply of about 1.6 billion tokens, and a max total supply of 5 billion. It has increased by 9.1% over the past 7 days. The "deflationary design" emphasized by the team is also noteworthy—each network transaction destroys a portion of tokens, so the more people use it, the greater the scarcity pressure.
**Final Observation**
For protocols like Walrus, I think the key isn't just "how good the story is," but whether the three aspects—privacy protection (Seal), cost optimization (Quilt), and user experience (Upload Relay)—can truly drive active daily users and paid usage. From this perspective, the recent product rhythm is indeed moving in the right direction.