The crypto market in 2026 is undergoing a clear transformation. Institutions are no longer chasing after elusive concepts but are instead pouring money into projects that solve real problems and have stable cash flows. The background for this shift is very clear— the total supply of stablecoins is about to break through $600 billion and has become an essential part of financial infrastructure.
In this wave, a category of projects is beginning to emerge: specialized L1 public chains. Rather than a "public chain competition," it’s more of a "deep domain specialization" race. Ripple focuses on institutional DeFi, Hedera targets RWA, and these leading projects are all doing the same thing—finding their own niche and pouring resources into it.
Plasma’s approach is exactly like this. From the moment of its architecture design, it was tailored for stablecoins—not as an auxiliary feature, but as a core part of the ecosystem. Why is this so important? Because stablecoins have evolved from speculative tools to everyday payments, cross-border remittances, and merchant settlements—real financial needs that generate genuine transaction volume.
From a technical perspective, the Paymaster mechanism enables zero-fee stablecoin transactions. What does this mean for users? Payment costs are essentially eliminated. This is not just optimization; it’s a dimensionality reduction attack. While other public chains are still figuring out how to build DeFi ecosystems, Plasma has already solved the biggest pain point in payments.
Looking at it from another angle—projects still chasing hot trends in 2026 are likely to have little future. But those that firmly follow a professional specialization route, especially those that tap into the clear and continuously growing demand for stablecoins, are the ones worth paying attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenDreamer
· 7h ago
Zero fees? That's the real blow to the competition; other public chains are still dreaming.
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamer
· 7h ago
Zero transaction fees are truly unbeatable, but the problem is that user scale isn't growing. No matter how elegant the solution, without volume it's useless.
Forget it, another story-teller. Let's wait until Plasma really generates trading volume before talking.
Stablecoins should have been taken seriously a long time ago. Why are professional L1s only appearing now?
This article feels similar to the hype from half a year ago about Hedera dominating the world... Hopefully, this time it won't be a face slap.
Zero payment costs sound great, but who bears the operational costs? It can't really be zero cost, right?
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 8h ago
Zero-fee stablecoin? This is what I want to see, not those hype concept coins.
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBro
· 8h ago
Zero transaction fees are a bit questionable; it still depends on the actual rollout effect.
Stablecoins are indeed a necessity, but can Plasma really carve out a slice of this cake?
This professional track sounds good, but the key is to survive through this year.
This perspective is fresh; focusing on doing one thing well is indeed more reliable than meddling everywhere.
Projects backed by real money from institutions usually have some skills.
That's right, those who only hype concepts should have exited long ago.
Zero payment costs sound great, but whether the ecosystem can keep up is the real issue.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtist
· 8h ago
Zero transaction fees sound great, but can the stablecoin ecosystem really get off the ground?
---
The Plasma architecture indeed hits the mark. While other L1s are still competing in DeFi, it has already focused on payments.
---
That's right, the only thing that matters now for institutions is—cash flow. The era of concept tokens is really coming to an end.
---
Wait, can the Paymaster mechanism truly sustain zero fees in the long run? How does the economic model behind it work?
---
I agree with the idea of a professional track route, but whether Plasma can truly become infrastructure depends on user base size.
---
Breaking through 600 billion in stablecoins is just around the corner. Projects that address payment pain points are definitely worth watching.
---
But to be fair, can't the DeFi ecosystem and the payment ecosystem coexist? Do we really have to choose one over the other?
---
Reducing dimensions to strike a blow is too absolute... but zero transaction fees are indeed a hardcore selling point, and that can't be denied.
View OriginalReply0
MeltdownSurvivalist
· 8h ago
Stablecoin zero fees are a bit of an overhype, to be honest. The real issues are liquidity and merchant acceptance; technical barriers are actually not that high.
Real cash flow is the key, I agree with that. But whether Plasma can succeed depends on execution; a beautiful architecture doesn't necessarily mean the market will buy in.
I think the trend is already shifting towards practicality among institutions; the era of virtual concepts is truly over. However, with a stablecoin market worth 600 billion, there will definitely be a lot of competition...
The Paymaster mechanism with zero fees is somewhat innovative, but whether it can become a long-term competitive advantage is hard to say. We'll see.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBard
· 8h ago
Zero fees? That sounds unbelievable, but the Paymaster system is indeed impressive. I agree that stablecoins have become a necessity, but I'm just worried it might be another hype.
That said, are institutions really shifting towards a pragmatic approach, or are they just looking for new stories to tell retail investors?
Plasma is quite interesting; focusing on a single track without chasing the wind is worth watching. The problem is whether it will be just a flash in the pan.
The figure of 600 billion in stablecoins is indeed shocking, but how much of that is actual trading volume and real-world application scenarios? It still feels like too many concepts are being packaged.
RWA, DeFi, payments... these tracks also face stiff competition. Why would Plasma stand out? I haven't seen a particularly strong moat.
The crypto market in 2026 is undergoing a clear transformation. Institutions are no longer chasing after elusive concepts but are instead pouring money into projects that solve real problems and have stable cash flows. The background for this shift is very clear— the total supply of stablecoins is about to break through $600 billion and has become an essential part of financial infrastructure.
In this wave, a category of projects is beginning to emerge: specialized L1 public chains. Rather than a "public chain competition," it’s more of a "deep domain specialization" race. Ripple focuses on institutional DeFi, Hedera targets RWA, and these leading projects are all doing the same thing—finding their own niche and pouring resources into it.
Plasma’s approach is exactly like this. From the moment of its architecture design, it was tailored for stablecoins—not as an auxiliary feature, but as a core part of the ecosystem. Why is this so important? Because stablecoins have evolved from speculative tools to everyday payments, cross-border remittances, and merchant settlements—real financial needs that generate genuine transaction volume.
From a technical perspective, the Paymaster mechanism enables zero-fee stablecoin transactions. What does this mean for users? Payment costs are essentially eliminated. This is not just optimization; it’s a dimensionality reduction attack. While other public chains are still figuring out how to build DeFi ecosystems, Plasma has already solved the biggest pain point in payments.
Looking at it from another angle—projects still chasing hot trends in 2026 are likely to have little future. But those that firmly follow a professional specialization route, especially those that tap into the clear and continuously growing demand for stablecoins, are the ones worth paying attention to.