Currently, the entire screen is filled with public chains competing in TPS and ecosystems, but do you actually use them to transfer funds? The experience is still quite fragmented.



There is a project that has chosen a different approach: not pursuing the "big and comprehensive" model, but focusing solely on stablecoin settlement. It may sound a bit "less ambitious," but upon closer inspection, they are targeting a real pain point.

In payment scenarios, there is indeed a "culture shock"—users want to transfer quickly but end up waiting half a day; to use it, they first need to buy native tokens to pay gas fees, with high entry barriers. This project's solution is quite pragmatic: PlasmaBFT achieves sub-second confirmation, making transfers no longer a mystical process; even more impressively, they have revamped the gas mechanism—directly supporting USDT and USDC to pay for gas, and even offering gas-free small transactions.

With this change, users no longer need to hold native tokens, significantly lowering the barrier to entry. Coupled with EVM compatibility and security guarantees from the Bitcoin network, the fundamentals are indeed solid.

Thinking it through thoroughly, for crypto to truly go mainstream, payments are an essential step, and stablecoins are the fuel. When real-world assets and institutional funds come in large scale, a specialized, high-efficiency settlement network will be needed. The positioning of this "native stablecoin chain" just fills a blue ocean that has been overlooked.

If stablecoins are truly the infrastructure of future finance, then projects like this are laying the most critical groundwork. It’s worth watching how they use an exceptional user experience to open up the payment market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterXvip
· 12h ago
It's another case of talking about gas fees, but this time the approach is indeed clear—rather than following the trend of competing on TPS, focus on the payment experience.
View OriginalReply0
TideRecedervip
· 12h ago
This is what I want—no pretenses, directly addressing real pain points.
View OriginalReply0
RatioHuntervip
· 13h ago
Hey, finally someone is seriously working on payments. Don't just focus on those fake TPS numbers.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterZhangvip
· 13h ago
Not paying gas fees directly hits the pain point, this is truly considering the users' interests.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWangvip
· 13h ago
Bro, this is the right way. Stop playing those virtual TPS number games. Payments should be done like this—using stablecoins to pay for gas directly is the sensible approach.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)