2026-01-17 06:24:06

If you only tell the story of blockchain evolution from "single chain to Rollup-led Layer2," you will miss a huge ideological system—the set of technical concepts represented by Plasma, emphasizing "sovereign validation" and "off-chain freedom."

Currently, we are discussing Celestia's data availability layer, EigenLayer's re-staking, and Optimism's super chain plan—all of which are actually following the ideological path pioneered by Plasma. It's just that this path has been renamed and repackaged. What Plasma carried is not just a legacy of a technical solution but also a key to interpreting the ultimate form of blockchain.

**Plasma did not fail; it was simply overshadowed by more urgent needs.**

Many people interpret Plasma's "later" position as a user experience issue—the long exit verification period indeed drives people crazy. But that is not the real reason.

The true story is this: from 2020 to 2023, what did the DeFi Summer and NFT boom bring? It was a frantic demand for "super-fast capital flow." Rollups, especially Optimistic Rollups, directly bind security to Layer1, offering a compromise solution that is "low trust cost" and "user experience close to internet applications." This precisely hit the market's most eager point at the time—could liquidity move seamlessly?

So Plasma didn't lose to the technology itself; it lost to market cycles and the most urgent needs of the moment. These are two different things.

TIA5,81%

EIGEN3,94%

OP5,61%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugpullSurvivor

· 5h ago

Damn, so Plasma isn't dead, it's just being suppressed by market greed? That logic is actually pretty heartbreaking.

View OriginalReply0

SelfSovereignSteve

· 12h ago

Oh no, someone finally spoke out. Plasma has been heavily criticized and misunderstood. --- The sovereignty verification system has long been embedded in the DNA of Celestia and EigenLayer; it’s just that no one recognizes it because of the different branding. --- Basically, it was a time when DeFi was crazy. No one cared about off-chain freedom; fast liquidity was what mattered. --- Rollup's success isn't because of superior technology; it’s simply because it caught the right wave. This needs to be made clear. --- It feels like we’re taking a very long detour, only to end up back at the problem Plasma was trying to solve. --- That long withdrawal verification period is indeed annoying, but the author is right—it's not a fatal flaw. It’s just that no one could wait at that time. --- Renaming and rebranding—Web3 is like that: old wine in a new bottle, and investors still buy it. --- The key to the ultimate form? It seems no one has truly figured this out yet; everyone is just drawing their own pie in the sky.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 12h ago

The Bollinger Bands resistance level hasn't been broken yet, and the Plasma logic should have been restarted long ago... The coercion of the market cycle is indeed strong, but the RSI indicator shows that fuel supply is sufficient now. In the next launch window, Plasma-based assets are likely to re-enter the orbit.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMasked

· 12h ago

Oh, about Plasma, it was indeed overlooked, but it's not dead. Now looking at projects like Celestia and EigenLayer, cough cough, they're just rebranding and continuing the Plasma path.

View OriginalReply0

OnlyOnMainnet

· 13h ago

Wait, Plasma is not dead at all? Now that you mention it, I think I understand, I feel like I misunderstood before.

View OriginalReply0