The wave of RWA (Real World Assets) has already arrived. The global asset tokenization market is expected to surpass one trillion dollars, but questions follow—who will build this infrastructure?
Imagine this scenario: a company issues digital bonds, with investor identities and holdings protected, but the issuer and regulators can perform compliance checks when necessary. This is not a fantasy, but a real-world problem that some chains focused on regulated DeFi are working to solve.
Current pain points are obvious. The integration of traditional finance and on-chain worlds is hindered by three issues—poor privacy protection, complex compliance processes, and low settlement efficiency. Many projects want to enter the RWA track but lack technical solutions that truly understand regulatory requirements. Meanwhile, public chains designed specifically for institutional capital are changing the game with a combination of "privacy + compliance + efficiency."
In comparison, while other blockchains are still chasing various hot topics, these projects are already focusing on the real demand side—institutional-level capital entry. They understand that the next bull market's driving force is not retail enthusiasm but large-scale institutional allocation.
So, it’s worth pondering: where will the most easily triggered nodes for the RWA track be? Will it be a major asset successfully tokenized on-chain for the first time? Or recognition from a national-level financial infrastructure? Or the official participation of a leading institution?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichDetector
· 8h ago
A hundred trillion market cap sounds impressive, but how many can actually be implemented? Privacy compliance still requires institutions to bear the costs.
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluff
· 8h ago
One hundred trillion dollars sounds like the next story to be cut again, but actually implementing it is much more difficult.
It seems to be about institutional entry again, but honestly, who would really be the first to take the plunge?
Compliance is indeed a bottleneck; privacy and censorship always clash with each other.
One hundred trillion? I think five hundred billion is more realistic, haha.
Actually, it mainly depends on big companies or a certain country really taking action; otherwise, it's all just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidator
· 8h ago
Institutional collusion sounds good in theory, but how many can actually implement it? Ten trillion sounds impressive, but the key is who can get the regulatory framework under control.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForMemes
· 8h ago
One hundred trillion sounds impressive, but how many of them can actually be implemented? It's probably just another few years of waiting.
The wave of RWA (Real World Assets) has already arrived. The global asset tokenization market is expected to surpass one trillion dollars, but questions follow—who will build this infrastructure?
Imagine this scenario: a company issues digital bonds, with investor identities and holdings protected, but the issuer and regulators can perform compliance checks when necessary. This is not a fantasy, but a real-world problem that some chains focused on regulated DeFi are working to solve.
Current pain points are obvious. The integration of traditional finance and on-chain worlds is hindered by three issues—poor privacy protection, complex compliance processes, and low settlement efficiency. Many projects want to enter the RWA track but lack technical solutions that truly understand regulatory requirements. Meanwhile, public chains designed specifically for institutional capital are changing the game with a combination of "privacy + compliance + efficiency."
In comparison, while other blockchains are still chasing various hot topics, these projects are already focusing on the real demand side—institutional-level capital entry. They understand that the next bull market's driving force is not retail enthusiasm but large-scale institutional allocation.
So, it’s worth pondering: where will the most easily triggered nodes for the RWA track be? Will it be a major asset successfully tokenized on-chain for the first time? Or recognition from a national-level financial infrastructure? Or the official participation of a leading institution?