As the daily trading volume of stablecoins rises to the trillion-dollar level, the issues of fees and congestion on traditional public blockchains become increasingly prominent when handling payment scenarios. A new wave of Layer1 blockchains optimized for the payment track has emerged, with high-performance solutions centered around the PlasmaBFT consensus mechanism attracting market attention.



These payment-oriented public chains adopt a unique technical approach. The architecture based on PlasmaBFT can achieve over 2000+ TPS throughput and sub-second transaction confirmation times, reducing cross-chain payment settlement from minutes to seconds. More innovatively, there is a zero-fee stablecoin transfer mechanism—system-level payment contracts bear the Gas costs, allowing users to complete peer-to-peer transfers and merchant settlements simply by holding stablecoins like USDT. This somewhat simulates the instant usability experience of traditional payment applications and is highly attractive to new Web3 users.

The flexible multi-asset payment design is also noteworthy. Supporting multiple tokens such as BTC and USDT to cover Gas fees breaks the limitations of single-token ecosystems, providing more options for transaction participants. From an architectural perspective, the three-layer design balances performance and security—Bitcoin sidechains ensure asset finality through settlement guarantees, while full EVM compatibility offers migration pathways for mature DeFi protocols like Curve and Aave.

From a market perspective, the high-frequency demand for stablecoin payments and the cost bottlenecks of existing public chains are driving the emergence of specialized solutions. Both institutional funds and individual users are seeking infrastructure that guarantees security while providing a good payment experience. These public chain solutions focused on payment efficiency and cost optimization are becoming an important direction for industry exploration.
BTC-0,16%
AAVE-1,31%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DefiOldTrickstervip
· 14h ago
Zero fees? Well, I wonder where the Gas comes from—system-level contracts placing orders? In the end, someone still has to pay the bill—either through token inflation or early subsidies. The tricks are all the same old story.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBotvip
· 21h ago
Zero fees are quite interesting, but to be honest, the key is when it will truly be implemented and popularized.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapyvip
· 01-17 06:51
Zero fees sound great, but can system-level contracts really sustain themselves in the long run? It feels like adjustments will be needed someday.
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlItvip
· 01-17 06:47
Zero fee transfers? Sounds good, but who ultimately bears the cost of system contract buy orders? Isn't it the token holders?
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurkervip
· 01-17 06:47
Zero fees? Sounds great, but I wonder who is really bearing the cost.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiacvip
· 01-17 06:41
Zero fees? System-level contracts承担Gas? This incentive-compatible logic needs a close look—who ultimately pays the bill? It all comes back to token holders, which is the hidden tax, the old trick of harmonious wealth. To put it simply, high TPS is nothing new; the key is how this governance mechanism is designed. Does it prevent malicious actors or not? Wait, multi-asset acting as Gas fee... can it truly avoid single-asset risk, or is it just a new way to cut the leeks? I believe in cross-chain payments from minutes to seconds, but does the three-layer security design have historical precedents to support it? Don’t end up learning the Ronin lesson. It’s essentially redefining the boundary costs of payments, but how the ecosystem governance rights are distributed is the real critical issue. High-frequency demand for stablecoin payments is genuine, but who will regulate the power of this "system-level contract"? Is the DAO proposal process transparent?
View OriginalReply0
Liquidated_Larryvip
· 01-17 06:35
Zero fees are truly unbeatable; finally, someone has solved the payment issue once and for all.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapistvip
· 01-17 06:26
Zero fees? We'll see after a few months of actual operation; it sounds a bit too ideal.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)