After institutions enter the on-chain world, they face an awkward dilemma — the need for flexible privacy transactions, yet the dependence on compliance and regulatory constraints. The emergence of DUSK seems to offer a new approach.
DUSK does not want to follow the traditional path of general-purpose computing platforms. It has chosen a more precise track: building the underlying on-chain operations for institutional-grade digital assets. This positioning is rooted in a deep understanding of the real needs of institutions.
Technologically, DUSK’s killer feature is verifiable privacy. Simply put, it allows institutions to achieve two seemingly contradictory goals: conducting fully private transactions and complex financial operations (such as privacy lending and dark pool trading), while simultaneously generating tamper-proof compliance proofs. When necessary, these proofs can be selectively shown to specific auditors or regulators to demonstrate that the entire process complies with regulations.
This design is often described as "invisible to the market, transparent to regulators." It may sound abstract, but for institutions, it is a genuine need. Especially today, when large amounts of funds are flowing on-chain, this solution fills a previous gap.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpAnalyst
· 01-19 20:49
Cautious outlook, but the logic behind DUSK's zero-knowledge proof wave is indeed impressive.
I've been watching this institutional-grade underlying track for a while, and honestly, it's a bit uncertain. Privacy + compliance sounds great, but how much of it can actually be implemented? Everyone should note that this is where the big players hype the most.
Market invisibility to regulators sounds good, but don't take it seriously. The problem is, will regulators truly accept it? A technically impressive solution doesn't mean the practical side isn't awkward.
To put it simply, they want institutions to be able to trade secretly while passing audits. It's a nice idea, but I just want to know when this system will actually go live on the chain.
I'm not trying to discourage everyone, but history shows that every time a project claims to fill a gap, it's often the deepest cut for retail investors. Risk control must be well managed.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirst
· 01-19 11:16
Wow, this is the real way to have the best of both worlds. Can privacy and compliance be achieved simultaneously? Zero-knowledge proofs are about to take off, right?
View OriginalReply0
orphaned_block
· 01-18 22:23
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but can they really be implemented? It still seems to depend on whether institutions are willing to accept it.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHome
· 01-17 06:48
Zero-knowledge proofs sound pretty impressive, but can they really reassure institutions?
I can't help but think, what if they get caught under government regulation? The term "selective disclosure" itself is a bit risky...
DUSK has indeed found a loophole, but how long can this loophole last?
It still feels like dancing on a tightrope—one misstep by the institution and they have to take the blame.
View OriginalReply0
SundayDegen
· 01-17 06:45
Zero-knowledge proofs sound very appealing, but can they really reassure institutions?
It still feels a bit vague and uncertain...
Can this thing really become popular?
Transparency in regulation sounds quite contradictory; what's the difference from centralization?
DUSK has indeed hit the pain point this time, but how is the ecosystem?
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTrapper
· 01-17 06:30
actually if you read the tokenomics... selective transparency to regulators is just regulatory theater with extra steps lol
Reply0
ChainDoctor
· 01-17 06:26
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but honestly, it's like wanting to have both fish and bear paws at the same time—can it be done?
After institutions enter the on-chain world, they face an awkward dilemma — the need for flexible privacy transactions, yet the dependence on compliance and regulatory constraints. The emergence of DUSK seems to offer a new approach.
DUSK does not want to follow the traditional path of general-purpose computing platforms. It has chosen a more precise track: building the underlying on-chain operations for institutional-grade digital assets. This positioning is rooted in a deep understanding of the real needs of institutions.
Technologically, DUSK’s killer feature is verifiable privacy. Simply put, it allows institutions to achieve two seemingly contradictory goals: conducting fully private transactions and complex financial operations (such as privacy lending and dark pool trading), while simultaneously generating tamper-proof compliance proofs. When necessary, these proofs can be selectively shown to specific auditors or regulators to demonstrate that the entire process complies with regulations.
This design is often described as "invisible to the market, transparent to regulators." It may sound abstract, but for institutions, it is a genuine need. Especially today, when large amounts of funds are flowing on-chain, this solution fills a previous gap.