#数字资产市场动态 Japan's rare earths trial mining at 6,000 meters underwater looks like a technological breakthrough, but in reality, it reflects a major country's resource anxiety.



Japan's dependence on imported rare earths exceeds 90%. The true purpose of this deep-sea mining attempt is to break this passive situation. But the problem is: deep-sea mining costs are over ten times higher than land-based mining. The current trial has only extracted kilogram-level rare earth oxides, and it will take more than 10 years to reach commercial production.

What's more painful is that 90% of the world's rare earth separation and refining technology is controlled by a few countries. Even if you dig up the ore, the subsequent smelting and processing stages are still subject to others.

Adding to the challenge is environmental protection—disturbing deep-sea sediments could cause ecological damage, which has already attracted opposition from multiple countries. In the short term, this trial mining is more of a strategic signal and is unlikely to truly change the global rare earth landscape; in the long term, overcoming technological barriers, cost pressures, and environmental restrictions are all necessary, and success remains uncertain. Deep-sea mining is destined to be a long journey.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WalletInspectorvip
· 5h ago
Is it possible to commercialize in 10 years? Japan is digging its own grave. --- Basically, having mines is useless; the rest of the work still depends on who you face. --- Deep-sea mining costs are skyrocketing; no matter how you calculate it, it's not cost-effective. --- The bottleneck is always refining technology; digging more mud is pointless. --- Environmental issues lead to work stoppages as soon as they arise, which is indeed quite challenging. --- Breaking the passive state? Feels like self-comfort, with a dependency level still at 90%. --- Trading ten times the cost for a few kilograms of rare earths—can this business really be done? --- Instead of deep-sea mining, it's better to negotiate; technology is the real trump card. --- It's just strategic signaling; can we see actual output? --- Multiple countries oppose environmental destruction; Japan is really provoking public outrage.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanboy42vip
· 5h ago
Basically, it's just throwing money around to make a show, and after 10 years, there's still no progress.
View OriginalReply0
GovernancePretendervip
· 5h ago
I thought about it, and this is just a gimmick to cut leeks. Ten times the cost and waiting ten years, by then maybe the new energy sector will have already switched to a different track.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkievip
· 5h ago
Basically, it's just that it can't be mined out; the technical bottleneck is right there.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)