2026-01-17 05:33:42

There are two types of people in the market. One chooses to participate, and the other chooses to wait and see. Spectators seem safe, but in fact they are the easiest to be led by the market—chasing highs and selling lows, cycling repeatedly. Even if they encounter a market that multiplies by thousands of times, they will still incur losses because the rhythm is always in someone else's hands.

True strong players never get caught up in the market's ups and downs. What they do is: participate, build, and persist. This spirit is like some mainstream coins, from 0 to 1, and then from 1 to N, relying on community co-creation and long-termism.

We may not become the pioneers, but we can definitely become true builders. Join us and help develop the ecosystem—this is where the opportunity lies.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RadioShackKnight

· 10h ago

It seems to be about participation vs. observation, but to be honest, most people who chase gains and sell off are doing so not because they lack conviction, but because they haven't participated. It's easy to say, but how many can truly stick with it?

View OriginalReply0

TaxEvader

· 10h ago

That's easy to say, but how many can really stick with it? It sounds nice, but most people only realize this after they've been caught in a trap. "Builder" sounds really dreamy; I just want to steadily earn some profit from the price difference. It's all about long-termism. The last time I heard this, the coin dropped 80%. Participation is okay, but the premise is to understand whether you're gambling or investing. Going from 0 to 1 sounds impressive, but what if you end up holding the bag? How should I put it?

View OriginalReply0

TradingNightmare

· 10h ago

Sounds good, but talk is cheap compared to action. --- Participation and building sound like motivational slogans, but how many can really stick to it? --- Community co-creation? I just want to know how to identify who is a true builder and who is just here to harvest profits. --- From 0 to 1 sounds exciting, but 99% of projects die halfway. What about this one? --- Long-termism in the crypto world is a joke; everyone runs away as soon as a bear market hits. --- Is the rhythm controlled by others? Then what do you so-called builders hold in your hands? --- Instead of talking so much about principles, why not discuss how to participate without getting exploited? --- Isn't this just another way to encourage retail investors to enter the market? --- Still the same, without any actual return promises, even the best visions are just air. --- Building an ecosystem? First, fix the problems within the project itself.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPhobia

· 10h ago

It's the same story again, I've heard it many times haha --- Observers are always the ones who get cut last, I believe that --- The question is what really counts as a builder, isn't it just self-comfort for those who hold no chips --- Going from 0 to 1 is possible, but no one knows where N is, right --- Participation is easy, but persistence is indeed a hurdle --- Community co-creation sounds beautiful, but in reality, it all depends on who runs faster --- No one tells you when to enter or when to withdraw, it's all after the fact --- There's nothing wrong with that statement, it all depends on who dares to go all in --- Strong players don't dwell on price fluctuations? That's just polite talk when they've made money --- How to build the ecosystem, give me a roadmap

View OriginalReply0