When it comes to potential public chain projects in 2025, one name cannot be ignored: Plasma($XPL). Although it’s not as hot as the star projects from top exchanges, the design of this chain is indeed interesting.



Speaking of which, Plasma’s emergence fills a pain point. Previously in the crypto space, to transfer funds, you had to hold ETH or TRX to use USDT, and each interaction incurred a fee. Plasma’s idea is straightforward—build a dedicated stablecoin payment channel that allows USDT transfers with zero fees. It’s no exaggeration to say it’s as smooth as transferring money via WeChat.

The current token price is $0.14. Early participants received an average of over 200 USDT in Alpha airdrops, with a low threshold that could be claimed within a few hours. This start-up phase is indeed sincere.

**How to make money**

This is the key. Free transfers sound generous, but how does the project maintain its ecosystem? The answer lies in token design. Transfers are indeed free, but once users start trading, lending, or interacting with NFTs, they need to consume $XPL. This is the first layer of value.

The second layer is more clever. When the network is congested, the system automatically destroys some tokens. The higher the ecosystem’s popularity, the fewer circulating tokens there are. This is a typical deflationary mechanism—burning as you use.

Looking deeper, $XPL also acts as a security deposit for the network. This is standard in PoS mechanisms, but its application in payment scenarios is still relatively new.

**Comparison with TRON**

Mentioning Plasma naturally brings up a comparison with TRON(Tron). TRON has already made achievements in the payment field, and its market scale is not small. Plasma’s ambition is clearly to carve out a share, but to truly challenge TRON’s position, more effort is needed in user stickiness and ecosystem applications.

That said, the demand for stablecoin payment tracks does exist. Consider how many scenarios require fast, low-cost transfers. If Plasma can truly excel in this aspect, its growth potential won’t be small.

The current key is whether the ecosystem applications can keep up. Attracting users with free transfers is just the first step; high-value interactions like DeFi and NFTs are essential to retain users. From this perspective, the long-term performance of XPL depends on the speed of ecosystem development.
XPL1,35%
ETH1,27%
TRX3%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiDoctorvip
· 10h ago
Zero fees sound great, but I have to ask—where are the user retention metrics? Relying solely on airdrops of 200U to attract users, they transfer the funds and then leave. This isn't user retention; it's just harvesting the wool and then dispersing.
View OriginalReply0
PrivacyMaximalistvip
· 10h ago
Zero fees sound good, but it depends on whether the ecosystem can truly keep up.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBrokenPromisevip
· 10h ago
Zero fees sound great, but without ecosystem applications keeping up, it's just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)