Recently, subtle shifts have occurred within the internal power structure of the Federal Reserve. Jerome Powell is about to step down from his chairmanship, but according to the planned term, he may continue to serve as a board member until 2028. This potential change in the power structure has become a focal point of market attention.
From multiple perspectives, the complexity of this leadership transition is beyond imagination:
On one hand, the current chair faces pressure from the Department of Justice. He recently issued a firm statement via video, emphasizing that the independence of the central bank must not be infringed—this public stance itself indicates the seriousness of the situation. Meanwhile, the appointment of the new chair has encountered obstacles in the Senate, with key senators insisting on "clarifying related issues before voting." This has directly led to difficulties in filling the vacant board seat.
On the other hand, the U.S. Supreme Court is about to rule on a mortgage fraud case. The key issue in this lawsuit is whether the President has the authority to dismiss Federal Reserve Board members at will. If the ruling favors presidential authority, the independence framework of the Fed will face redefinition.
How will these variables collectively impact the market? The most immediate consequence is that FOMC decisions may become divided internally. The implementation of interest rate policies will become more uncertain, and market volatility is likely to become the norm.
In contrast, this highlights the unique value of decentralized financial systems. When traditional financial decision-making centers are troubled by power struggles, crypto assets operating under code rules and transparent transactions become increasingly scarce in their "resistance to intervention." No matter how macro patterns change, this characteristic will remain unchanged.
What is the future direction? The market is awaiting the Supreme Court's ruling and observing how new and old powers interact. For on-chain asset holders, this period's market lessons may be even more worth remembering.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerPrivateKey
· 10h ago
Wait, Powell is staying until 2028? Doesn't that mean the Federal Reserve will be messing around for a few more years?
This move is really playing with fire. Once the Supreme Court makes a ruling, power gets all over the place, and it's hard to say who really controls the interest rate policy.
Anyway, we have the blockchain, so what are we afraid of?
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStation
· 10h ago
The Fed's show is getting more and more intense; we just sit back and watch the power struggle unfold.
Powell wants to leave but doesn't, the Senate is deadlocked, and the Supreme Court still has to rule... Basically, it's internal conflicts within traditional finance. At this point, the logic of on-chain assets becomes clearer.
No matter how they mess around, code is code. I believe in that.
View OriginalReply0
GasSavingMaster
· 10h ago
This big show by the Federal Reserve essentially exposes the fragility of traditional finance. At this point, it's even more important to hold tight to your BTC and ETH.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 10h ago
nah the real alpha here is watching the fed fumble their own governance structure while we're over here with immutable rule sets. opportunity cost of centralization getting more expensive by the day, fr fr
Reply0
HodlOrRegret
· 10h ago
Powell still wants to keep it, interesting. But honestly, the traditional financial power game is quite a hassle.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClass
· 10h ago
nah this is literally 2008 playbook 2.0, fed in chaos = btc pumps, history doesn't repeat but it sure does rhyme
#美国核心物价涨幅不及市场预估 The Changing Power Dynamics of the Federal Reserve and New Uncertainties in the Crypto Market
$BTC $ETH $BNB
Recently, subtle shifts have occurred within the internal power structure of the Federal Reserve. Jerome Powell is about to step down from his chairmanship, but according to the planned term, he may continue to serve as a board member until 2028. This potential change in the power structure has become a focal point of market attention.
From multiple perspectives, the complexity of this leadership transition is beyond imagination:
On one hand, the current chair faces pressure from the Department of Justice. He recently issued a firm statement via video, emphasizing that the independence of the central bank must not be infringed—this public stance itself indicates the seriousness of the situation. Meanwhile, the appointment of the new chair has encountered obstacles in the Senate, with key senators insisting on "clarifying related issues before voting." This has directly led to difficulties in filling the vacant board seat.
On the other hand, the U.S. Supreme Court is about to rule on a mortgage fraud case. The key issue in this lawsuit is whether the President has the authority to dismiss Federal Reserve Board members at will. If the ruling favors presidential authority, the independence framework of the Fed will face redefinition.
How will these variables collectively impact the market? The most immediate consequence is that FOMC decisions may become divided internally. The implementation of interest rate policies will become more uncertain, and market volatility is likely to become the norm.
In contrast, this highlights the unique value of decentralized financial systems. When traditional financial decision-making centers are troubled by power struggles, crypto assets operating under code rules and transparent transactions become increasingly scarce in their "resistance to intervention." No matter how macro patterns change, this characteristic will remain unchanged.
What is the future direction? The market is awaiting the Supreme Court's ruling and observing how new and old powers interact. For on-chain asset holders, this period's market lessons may be even more worth remembering.