This actually reflects a core issue — the Web3 ecosystem indeed needs truly decentralized social platforms. Although Kaito still has many areas to improve, directly banning the platform is clearly not the solution. Giving users the right to choose and allowing projects to compete in an open environment is the true meaning of decentralization. Instead of forcibly shutting down, it's better to let the market and community make the judgment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SocialFiQueen
· 5h ago
What’s the point of calling it decentralization if you just ban it like this? That's funny.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fish
· 5h ago
That's right, centralized suppression really deserves to be condemned. If it weren't for these platforms constantly insisting on "my say so," Web3 wouldn't be such a mess.
View OriginalReply0
FarmHopper
· 5h ago
Well said. Centralized platforms are still playing the old tricks. Isn't this just about controlling the narrative? The meaning of decentralization is being completely undermined.
View OriginalReply0
WalletsWatcher
· 5h ago
That's right, centralized bans are outdated in Web3.
View OriginalReply0
nft_widow
· 6h ago
Banning this trick is really old, decentralization is still here, and centralized is still centralized.
This actually reflects a core issue — the Web3 ecosystem indeed needs truly decentralized social platforms. Although Kaito still has many areas to improve, directly banning the platform is clearly not the solution. Giving users the right to choose and allowing projects to compete in an open environment is the true meaning of decentralization. Instead of forcibly shutting down, it's better to let the market and community make the judgment.