2026-01-17 05:27:39

The operational logic of the project team, take a closer look: first, they publicly support a leading project, claiming they will make large purchases but there was no movement for a while. Only later did they actually start buying, and it was pointed out that they were hedging their positions. The explanation is self-protection by liquidity providers? Not long after, it was also reported that monthly incentives (5000+) were provided to KOLs to create buzz on social media. From promotion to operation to incentive chains, who is ultimately paying for whose interests in this combination? The market sees it all clearly.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NervousFingers

· 13h ago

This tactic is so familiar. The promised large buy-in turned out to be just hedging. Now they're paying KOLs to create hype—classic prelude to a rug pull.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 13h ago

the accumulation phase disguised as "liquidity protection" is honestly getting tired... watch the wallet clustering patterns though, that's where the real story lives. those kol incentive trails? pure behavioral engineering. market's not blind, just selective about what it wants to see.

Reply0

LightningLady

· 14h ago

This routine is becoming more and more obvious. The promised large buy-in was a no-show, then it was hedging and KOL incentives, are they here to shoot a drama? --- I'm really laughing. The slogan is shouted very loudly, but they won't spend a dime, and instead they want to give out money to create hype. Isn't this just openly pulling the wool over people's eyes? --- Paying KOLs with a 5000 monthly salary, does anyone still believe it... I see it as a big joke. --- Liquidity protection? Forget it, honestly, they want to have it both ways—wanting both short and long positions. The market isn't stupid. --- Brilliant, first creating expectations then operating in the opposite direction, and finally passing the buck to liquidity... I've seen this combo too many times.

View OriginalReply0