2026-01-17 05:27:30

My crypto strategy for 2026 is very clear: infrastructure assets are the moat for long-term returns.

This approach comes from a historical analogy. During the Gold Rush era, the last ones to laugh were not the gold miners themselves, but the merchants selling shovels, transportation, and logistics. In today’s DeFi ecosystem, lending protocols, stablecoins, and real-world asset on-chain (RWA) — these are the "shovels and transportation lines" of the on-chain economy, essential in both bull and bear markets.

Lista’s role in the BNB ecosystem is exactly that of an "infrastructure provider." The numbers speak for themselves: over 60% of the entire lending volume across the chain is supported by it, lisUSD stablecoin has become the raw material for building complex on-chain products, and in the RWA track, it has the first-mover advantage — packaging traditional financial assets like U.S. Treasuries into on-chain products, directly opening new funding channels.

With a TVL of $430 million, the scale is already quite significant, but more crucial is the revenue distribution mechanism. The 38.8% APR incentive for users locking in veLISTA essentially shares the protocol’s actual cash flow. This is not a pumped-up number from a meme coin, but real earnings generated by actual business.

In 2026, new products will go live: Stableswap Hub and on-chain credit lending tools will further expand service coverage. The "gold miners" on the demand side are increasing, and the "shovel types" on the supply side are also diversifying — a positive feedback signal.

Therefore, my understanding of LISTA is not just short-term chips, but a long-term rights token. Its growth does not depend on hype around the next hot coin, but on a certain reality: as long as the BNB Chain ecosystem develops and on-chain financing demand persists, Lista’s cash flow will continue. In this highly volatile market, such certainty is incredibly valuable.

LISTA12,34%

BNB2,27%

RWA-8,28%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xOverleveraged

· 2h ago

The gold rush and shovels metaphor is a well-worn phrase, but it's indeed the truth. The question is, are there still enough prospectors in the BNB ecosystem? It seems that Lista's logic is sound, except for the 38.8% APR part... can it really be sustained? The infrastructure is indeed solid, but who isn't praising infrastructure in this round? Wait, he said 60% of the lending scale is supporting it? What about the remaining 40%? Are competitors eyeing it closely?

View OriginalReply0

ChainWanderingPoet

· 10h ago

The gold rush metaphor of selling shovels is just perfect; it's really much more reliable than most people chasing hot coins. Is the 38.8% APR real money or just another round of tricks? That depends on whether it can hold up in the future. Infrastructure is indeed long-term, but we also need to think clearly about the ceiling of the BNB ecosystem itself. The combination of stablecoins like Lista + lending is solid, but the only concern is when regulatory authorities will step in. Agree, compared to chasing new coins, I also trust things with cash flow more.

View OriginalReply0

Ser_APY_2000

· 10h ago

The analogy of the gold rush selling shovels is brilliant, but can lista really support 60% of the lending scale? Seems a bit exaggerated. lista's 38.8% APR sounds good, but how long can such high returns be sustained? It can't stay this high forever. Infrastructure is indeed a long-term logic, but the problem is that competitors are also competing. Anyone can create a lending protocol. The 430 million TVL is actually quite average; in the entire chain ecosystem, it's uncertain whether it has enough influence. RWA is indeed innovative. I believe in the new track opened by bringing US Treasuries on-chain, but what about regulatory risks? It's nicely called an equity certificate, but it still feels like a gamble on BNB ecosystem not declining.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBarbecue

· 10h ago

The gold rush of selling shovels is indeed a brilliant metaphor, but that 38.8% APR... can it really hold up? It seems that infrastructure is indeed a long-term play, but how long the BNB chain can sustain itself is still a question. RWA (Real World Assets) is a bit appealing to me; directly connecting to government bonds is a new approach.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 10h ago

I've heard the logic behind the gold rush selling shovels too many times, but Lista's 60% lending scale really surprised me. This data is a bit solid.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHermit

· 10h ago

The idea of infrastructure is indeed valid, but it depends on how long the BNB ecosystem can support it. --- 60% lending scale sounds impressive, but when the ecosystem cools down, it can't hold up. That's the risk. --- The APR of veLISTA is so high, indicating that risk premium is also there. Don't just look at the yield. --- Gold rush comparisons are a bit cliché, but indeed, infrastructure tends to last the longest in each cycle. --- Whether lisUSD can truly meet the demand for RWA still depends on implementation; just talking about it isn't enough. --- I support the long-term equity token positioning, but I'm worried it might be treated as a short-term trading chip again. --- Is 38.8% APR real? Is there really such a high actual return? --- The question is whether BNB Chain can hold up itself; otherwise, everything else is pointless. --- The new product launching in 2026 sounds quite far away, can the space really be that big? --- The point about cash flow certainty is well made; at least it makes more sense than 99% of other coins.

View OriginalReply0