2026-01-17 05:27:16

I tend to view the USD1 update as a systemic "infrastructure upgrade."

This is not to align with any short-term event, but to truly implement the fundamentals of observation, discovery, and verification.

When on-chain data, token structure design, and real liquidity can be clearly visualized, participants' decision-making costs will significantly decrease. This is an obvious logic— the more symmetric the information, the more efficient the choices.

In the short term, such developments may not immediately ignite enthusiasm. But from a long-term perspective, this is precisely a boost to ecosystem health.

Compared to creating waves through emotions, I prefer this solid and steady "diligent effort" approach. Ultimately, the competitiveness of the ecosystem depends on the degree of infrastructure perfection.

USD10,01%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquiditySurfer

· 4h ago

To be honest, these kinds of infrastructure matters are often underestimated... The bear market is actually the golden period for doing these "boring tasks." When the returns are supposed to appear, people simply can't keep up.

View OriginalReply0

FalseProfitProphet

· 10h ago

Bro, this is the real deal, no fluff Rooting in infrastructure is way more meaningful than just talking big; taking it slow is better than rushing blindly Once data transparency is truly achieved, everything will naturally fall into place If you can't see the short-term gains, that's a good sign, indicating it's not a typical rug pull scheme

View OriginalReply0

ForumMiningMaster

· 10h ago

That's right, infrastructure is the true source of competitiveness. I'm optimistic about projects that focus on solid infrastructure. No hype, no negativity—when information is symmetrical, participants will naturally come. Long-term gains > short-term hype; not many people understand this logic. Only with fully developed infrastructure can we win—simple and straightforward. This is what I want to see; no fake stuff.

View OriginalReply0

PonziDetector

· 10h ago

Solid infrastructure is indeed easy to overlook, but it is the fundamental reason for the ecosystem's survival. Compared to hype, I trust this logic more. --- It's the same "long-termism" again, how many times have I heard this... The problem is, will participants really pay for the infrastructure? --- With increased transparency, decision-making costs can indeed be reduced, but only if someone is actually using it. Otherwise, even the most perfect infrastructure is just a display. --- Do all projects have to follow this approach? It seems some teams just lack the ability to generate hype and make up stories. --- This idea is sound, but I'm just worried that halfway through execution, they'll change course again and start some new activities. --- Transparency sounds good, but how many people on-chain can truly understand and make use of that data?

View OriginalReply0

ParanoiaKing

· 10h ago

Honestly, this calm and patient approach is indeed rare in the crypto world. Most projects only focus on hype. Those who truly build solid infrastructure are the long-term winners.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPhobia

· 10h ago

Infrastructure is easy to talk about, but few actually do it properly... However, USD1 is indeed quite interesting this time; finally, someone is willing to put in this kind of effort. Only when information is symmetrical can participant costs truly decrease. There's nothing wrong with this logic; most projects are just too lazy to do it. The ecosystem is worth much more than short-term hype, but unfortunately, the market is still crazy about chasing emotions... Sigh. Seeing through on-chain data is more effective than any marketing copy in helping people make rational decisions. This is real competitiveness, not something that can be sustained by hype and public opinion.

View OriginalReply0

OPsychology

· 10h ago

Build solid infrastructure; this is the right way. Much better than projects that rely on hype to attract attention, really. --- In the long run, this quiet, diligent approach is the only way to last. No short-term buzz, but this is true differentiated competitive advantage. --- Only when information is symmetric can participants make rational decisions. This is the most critical point. Many projects get stuck here. --- Projects that focus on building infrastructure without chasing hot trends, how much confidence must they have behind them? --- Still the same point: the degree of infrastructure completeness determines the ceiling of the ecosystem. It’s much more substantial than marketing copy. --- That’s why I believe in teams that work diligently. They may not be eye-catching in the short term, but they can last until the end. --- By making cold, on-chain data transparent, such an upgrade may sound simple, but it is actually the core competitive advantage.

View OriginalReply0