There's something worth examining about how certain protocols build momentum. Focus on shipping a solid product and backing it with aggressive token incentives—it's a formula that's been working. The tradeoff is real though: when you're sprinting to grab market share, centralization creeps in. Sometimes that's the price of execution. The question isn't whether it's right or wrong, but whether the short-term gains translate into sustainable dominance long-term. A lot of maturing projects are learning this lesson the hard way. #Web3

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OfflineNewbievip
· 21h ago
NGL, this old trick of using quick subsidies to swap for market share is indeed effective but always leaves endless troubles afterward.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmivip
· 21h ago
NGL, this is the current dilemma of Web3. The short-term gains-driven centralization ultimately benefits no one.
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collectorvip
· 21h ago
ngl this is the eternal contradiction of Web3: rapid expansion versus decentralization—it's like choosing between fish and bear's paw...
View OriginalReply0
OneBlockAtATimevip
· 21h ago
Speed and decentralization, the fish and the bear's paw... Is it really impossible to have both?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)