There is an interesting paradox in the financial markets—places with good liquidity often lack transparency, while transparent venues have prohibitively high trading costs.



Just look at traditional stock markets. Nasdaq and NYSE are both price-transparent, but once institutional investors place large orders, they are immediately targeted by high-frequency traders and arbitrageurs, resulting in significant slippage losses. That’s why Wall Street has developed dark pools. Data shows that over 40% of trading volume in the US stock market occurs in these private, opaque venues.

The problem is that dark pools themselves are also flawed. They are centralized operations, with information asymmetry; operators may profit from insider trading, and some traders can receive special treatment. In simple terms, bad money drives out good, and trust costs are extremely high.

DeFi initially aimed to solve the centralization problem, but ended up overcorrecting. Protocols like Uniswap are fully transparent—every order, position, and strategy is on-chain. This is fair for retail investors, but a nightmare for institutions. Want to buy $100 million worth of Dusk on-chain? Not only will you face MEV bots, but you’ll also be attacked by arbitrageurs across the market, causing transaction costs to explode.

Institutions are stuck in a dilemma: either tolerate the black box and fraud risks of traditional dark pools, or endure the transaction slippage in DeFi. Dusk Network is exploring a third way with zero-knowledge proof technology—ensuring decentralization while protecting transaction privacy, giving institutional funds a new option.
UNI-0,56%
DUSK16,88%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NervousFingersvip
· 23h ago
Dark pool accounts for 40% of trading volume? Isn't this just the legalization of Wall Street's black box operations? It cracks me up.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStackervip
· 23h ago
To be honest, this is the classic dilemma of choosing between fish and bear paws... Transparency sounds good, but when it comes to large transactions, it turns into a bloodbath scene.
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpertvip
· 23h ago
Wow, is this why I keep getting attacked in DeFi? My orders are visible on the entire chain for anyone to see, it's basically a suicidal trade.
View OriginalReply0
LayerHoppervip
· 23h ago
Really, transparency and liquidity can never be achieved simultaneously; this is the fate of finance. The dark pool system should have been dismantled long ago.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifiervip
· 23h ago
nah, dusk network's zk approach sounds good in theory but... requires further auditing before i'd actually trust it with real capital, tbh. the whole "third way" thing always has hidden attack vectors nobody catches until mainnet blows up. literally every privacy solution claims to solve this paradox and then... yeah. trust but verify, fr fr.
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)