Recently, while reviewing fintech research reports, I came across an interesting data point: 78% of institutional investors say that the complete transparency of public blockchains is their biggest obstacle to large-scale entry into DeFi. What they actually want is not faster chain speeds, but the concept of "confidential rooms" on-chain.



This demand truly hits the pain point. For example, a certain investment bank needs to execute a complex interest rate swap for a major client. Doing this on a regular blockchain? That’s equivalent to displaying the client’s risk positions and trading strategies on a giant screen in Times Square. Everyone can see it clearly.

Dusk Network’s approach is different. Instead of shouting "disrupt banking," it pragmatically focuses on "how to serve institutions well." On this chain, both trading parties can deploy confidential smart contracts, encrypting all transaction details throughout the process. Only the involved parties and designated third-party auditors (such as law firms) can decrypt and verify using keys, and only the net settlement amount is recorded on-chain. This protects strategic privacy while also addressing counterparty risk management.

They use a PDPoS consensus mechanism, with block times under 6 seconds. But more importantly, privacy protection is implemented at the consensus layer. In conventional PoS mechanisms, block proposals are transparent and vulnerable to targeted attacks. PDPoS is different—it even protects the information of "who proposed which block." It’s like pulling a curtain over the entire network operation process.

From the performance on the testnet, the data looks quite solid—handling over ten thousand private transactions, with average fees two orders of magnitude cheaper than those of dedicated privacy mixers, because this is an inherent design, not an afterthought.
DUSK16,88%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 23h ago
Wow, this is what Web3 is supposed to look like—it's not about daily hype of disruption but truly solving institutional pain points. Institutions care about privacy, not speed. This point is spot on. Dusk's PDPoS approach is truly excellent. Privacy protection at the consensus layer is well implemented... and the fees are two orders of magnitude cheaper? I'm a bit tempted, but we'll have to see the real performance after the mainnet launch.
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNodevip
· 23h ago
This is the truly understanding chain of institutions, not just shouting about disruption every day, but actually solving problems.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryvip
· 23h ago
Oh wow, this is the real deal --- Institutions are institutions, they don't care how fast your chain is, they just want privacy --- The idea behind Dusk is indeed interesting, but let's talk about it when big funds actually start to enter --- PDPoS encrypts the consensus layer? That’s impressive, I’ve never seen anything like that --- Having costs that are two orders of magnitude cheaper is a bit exaggerated, but native privacy is indeed better than post-implementation privacy --- The analogy of Times Square's big screen is brilliant haha --- Wait, is this real data or just another research report tricking me into clicking? --- So now privacy chains are finally gaining prominence, after being overshadowed by the transparency advocates for so long
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)