2026-01-17 04:37:31

The popularity of AI tokens on the SOL chain reminds me of the early launchpad projects—the most crazy narratives on the first and second days can indeed make money, especially if you catch the leading projects. But afterward, it becomes a matter of probability; when FOMO kicks in, trouble is not far behind. This AI boom is following the same rhythm.

To be honest, I am a novice when it comes to technical details. Vibe coin, AI tokens, and all that stuff, it's hard to really distinguish which ones are better or worse. Here's a painful point—whether the technology itself is good or not doesn't necessarily mean the market will accept it. Sometimes, a seemingly impressive plan is ignored, while some "amateur" projects thrive because of good storytelling and a strong community. This contradiction is the core challenge. So rather than obsessing over technical parameters, it's better to observe changes in market consensus.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SleepTrader

· 6h ago

It's the same old trick again; the leading project has to run the next day. Tech prowess is overrated; storytelling is the real key. This round of SOL is purely a gamble; those who wake up early make money, those who wake up late take the over. It's better to watch who runs first than to rely on consensus; that's the real truth.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 6h ago

lmao "market consensus" is just another word for who has better marketing budget tbh. watched this cycle thrice already—narrative beats fundamentals every single time, basis points don't lie.

Reply0

BasementAlchemist

· 6h ago

It's the same old story again, the leading project makes a move on the second day, and then it's all up to fate. No matter how advanced the technology is, without consensus, it's all pointless. That's the magical part of the crypto world. Narrative outweighs functionality—this hits home, and it's truly the case. When FOMO kicks in, blood pressure soars along with it. I've learned to be smarter. Consensus is the real hard currency; all the parameters are just虚的

View OriginalReply0

HodlVeteran

· 6h ago

Bro, I already flipped my car in this cycle back in 2018. Looking at the SOL narrative now, I just get chills... Those who made quick money on the first and second days are just lucky, and the ones who took over later are us retail investors. Honestly, no one cares about technical skills; market consensus is the real boss—this hits hard. I once thought a certain project was "really awesome" and went all in, only to end up losing everything. I'm not joking—every time this kind of hype arises, I can smell that same burnt smell from 2018. Bottoming out or waiting it out, the bear market tests your patience. Don't get caught up in the hype. Retail investors playing this are just betting on community hype, not on technology—realizing this early can save you a lot of trouble. Now, anything related to AI dares to call itself a token. I'm so fed up with it... Might as well buy some Bitcoin and sleep peacefully. As I get older, I prefer watching others FOMO. Getting out early is always better than anything else.

View OriginalReply0

defi_detective

· 6h ago

The first day of the leading project is indeed exciting, but the key is when to get off... It's another season of leek harvesting. Good projects don't make money, but trash projects are bustling with community activity, which is outrageous. FOMO, once triggered, makes people lose their rationality; losing money is inevitable. No matter how advanced the technology is, without consensus, it's useless. It's more valuable to observe the narrative than to look at the code. From early launchpads to today's AI coins, the套路 remains the same—it's just the leeks changing hands. Observing market consensus is spot on; it's much more reliable than studying technical documents.

View OriginalReply0